Be sure to add glenn@glennsacks.com to your address book or safe sender list so our emails get to your inbox.

 

Judge Removed by High Court After Denying Restraining Order Based on False DV Charges

November 5, 2007

 

In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part I)

Background: Conscientious Virginia judge James Michael Shull, who smoked out a woman who sought to extend a restraining order based on false charges of domestic violence, was just removed from the bench by this Virginia Supreme Court ruling.

I have examined the evidence in this case and it is clear to me that Shull is being railroaded. The case provides a sad but excellent example of what can happen to judges who take their responsibilities seriously when adjudicating domestic violence claims.

Shull's problems stem from a case which came before him on December 15, 2006. In that case, Tammy G. had obtained a domestic violence protection order against her husband Keith G., claiming that he had stabbed her. At the time of the G. hearing, the couple's two young children, then ages three and five, were staying with their paternal grandmother. Keith testified that he hadn't harmed Tammy, and that if she did have a wound, she had cut herself. Keith also testified that Tammy had committed a similar act on March 22, 2006, harming herself and then calling the police to report that Keith had attacked her.

Shull reasoned that he had to find the truth in order to protect the children from either a father who had stabbed their mother, or a mother who is a psychologically disturbed cutter. Shull examined the wounds and found that they were four nearly identical razor blade-like slices in two sets of parallel lines spaced evenly apart--hardly the type of wounds one would receive in domestic combat, and entirely consistent with Keith's allegations that Tammy had cut herself.

Shull also examined the Wise County Sheriff's Incident Report about Tammy G.'s March allegations. According to the report, Tammy "gave a statement that she had done this

Reach 6+ Million
Readers Every Year
Are you looking for an affordable way to reach over 6 million readers a year with your business or organization? My blog and my websites GlennSacks.com and HisSide.com receive over 10,000 unique visits a day. My weekly E-Newsletter has over 50,000 subscribers, and is by far the world's largest regularly distributed E-newsletter devoted to family law reform, fatherhood and fathers' issues. Contact us for more information.
 

Donate to Fathers & Families in Support of our "Elian Gonzalez II" Campaign

Donations are tax-deductible.

 

Need Help with Family Law or Child Support? Ask Glenn

to herself to get attention," and "admitted that she had self-inflicted her wounds." The report discusses charging Tammy with filing a false police report over the incident.

Shull got in trouble because, according to the Virginia Lawyers' Weekly, Tammy and Teresa Castle, the deputy clerk, claim that, in order to inspect the wound, he directed Tammy to expose herself twice during the hearing. The Virginia Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission "summarily suspended" Shull for "a substantial and serious breach of the dignity and decorum required in a Virginia courtroom."

Shull and Daniel Fast, Keith G.'s attorney, assert that Tammy had offered to lower her pants both times in order to show Shull the wounds. According to the VLW, neither side disputes that "the privacy curtains in the courtroom were pulled before G. exposed herself."

Tammy's wound was on her right thigh, she was wearing pants, and the only way Shull could examine the wounds was to have her lower them. Perhaps Shull should have acted more cautiously. However, his need to protect the G. children by ruling correctly in this difficult, contentious case vastly outweighs Tammy's privacy concerns. Most importantly, no party in the dispute is even claiming that Shull made the wrong decision in finding that the wounds in question were self-inflicted. Shull's conscientious pursuit of the truth in the G. case, for which he has been removed, was admirable.

To read my co-authored newspaper column defending Shull, click here.

The Shull case and the recent Virginia Supreme Court decision are an infuriating example of how lightly our legal system takes false accusations against men. In this case, everyone agrees that Judge Shull was placed in a very difficult situation, and that he had to make a tough call where children could have been in imminent danger. Nobody even disputes that he got it right--and yet it doesn't even matter.

Both the Virginia Supreme Court's 29-page opinion and the widely-disseminated Associated Press article by Larry O'Dell ignore the most important facts in this case and are biased against Shull to a bizarre extent. In this series, I will discuss the claims against Shull. O'Dell writes:

"The court said [the most 'egregious' incident] occurred when a woman was seeking a protective order against a partner who she said had stabbed her in the leg. Shull knew the woman had a history of mental problems and insisted on seeing the wound, the court said."

It is unclear that Shull was in a position to decide with finality that the woman, Tammy G., had "mental problems." More importantly, even if he was, what did the Court expect Shull to do? Shull had three options:

1) Decide that since the woman is mentally ill, he's not going to subject her to a full effort to find out whether or not her husband really did stab her, but instead just give the husband the children. In other words, don't ascertain the truth, but instead turn the kids over to a man who she claims tried to kill her.

2) Decide that since the woman is mentally ill, he won't put her through a full effort to ascertain the truth, but instead give her possession of the kids. In other words, give the kids to a mentally ill woman.

3) Ignore her apparent "mental problems," and make a real effort to ascertain the truth in the case in order to protect the children. Shull did that, and it cost him his job, his reputation, and his retirement pension.

In the AP article, Larry O'Dell writes that several years ago Shull had "advised a woman to marry her abusive boyfriend" and that he got in trouble with the JIRC because of it. I have not investigated this charge separately, but Shull very much disputes this account:

1) Shull disputes his alleged knowledge that relationship was "abusive."

2) Shull claims that his advice to get married occurred in a case where a woman's ex-husband had custody of their children and the woman wanted to know what she could do to improve her chances to get the kids back. Shull told her that social services would look more favorably on her situation if she were living in a more stable relationship, like being married as opposed to just living with someone. He didn't tell her she had to get married to get her kids back, he just told her it would strengthen her case.

3) Shull says that when JIRC investigated this accusation and others in 2004, his opponents' versions unraveled. He says, "These cases were dismissed not because of mercy toward a rookie judge, but because they imploded."

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.


Glenn Debates Texas Frozen Embryo Case on CNN (Video)

Background: In the Roman v. Roman Texas frozen embryo case, Augusta Roman and her then-husband Randy Roman had tried for several years to have a child (and had one miscarriage) before undergoing infertility treatments. They later divorced.

Augusta, 47, still wants to have the children, and Randy has refused. While undergoing the infertility treatments they had both signed a form which clearly stated that in the event of divorce, the embryos would not be implanted. The original trial judge in their divorce granted Augusta custody of the frozen embryos. Randy appealed the case, and in February the Texas Court of Appeal sided with him. In August, the Texas Supreme Court allowed the Court of Appeal ruling to stand.

My belief is that while it is unfortunate for Augusta Roman that she will never have a biological child, two people create a child, not one. Neither should be compelled to do so against their will. To learn more, see my co-authored column Texas Frozen Embryo case--In Defense of a Man's Right to Choose (Houston Chronicle, 6/14/07, Baltimore Sun, 6/17/07) or my debate with Augusta Roman and her attorney on Fox's Morning Show with Mike and Juliet here.

I debated Augusta Roman and her attorney Becky Reitz on CNN Prime News on November 1. CNN host Mike Galanos was (sigh) sympathetic to Augusta, and her side got most of the face time during the six minute segment.

As during previous debates, Augusta and Becky poured trash on Randy, vilifying him for what Reitz called the "deception, fraud, lack of forthrightness Randy perpetrated on Augusta." I contested this interpretation, of course--I think Randy did the right thing. Looking at how angry and mentally unbalanced Augusta is, I'm surprised Randy stayed as long as he did.

To watch the interview, click here.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.
 


Newsweek Quotes Glenn on 'Single Mothers by Choice'

Newsweek magazine writer Lorraine Ali quotes from my co-authored column Rise in Out-of-Wedlock Births Is Bad News for America's Kids (Washington Times, 12/4/06) in her new piece Knocking Yourself Up--Some women laugh about turkey basters replacing Mr. Right. The ongoing debate over going it alone (Newsweek, 11/5/07). The piece centers around Louise Sloan, author of the new guidebook Knock Yourself Up: A Tell-All Guide to Becoming a Single Mom. Sloan now has a fatherless 16-month-old son.

As you could guess, the piece favors women who decide to have fatherless children--the only named opposition to the practice in the piece is my short quote. Ali also quotes Rosanna Hertz, author of Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice. Hertz and Peggy Drexler, author of Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick Moms Are Creating the Next Generation of Exceptional Men, are the leading feminist gurus of voluntary single motherhood.

[To read my previous critique of Hertz and her book, see my co-authored column Are Single Mothers the 'New American Family?' (World Net Daily, 9/28/06). To see my previous critique of Drexler and her book, see my column Raising Boys Without Men: Lesbian Parents Good, Dads Bad (World Net Daily, 9/10/05)]

Obviously I disagree with much of what Ali (and Hertz and Drexler) have written, but I'll limit myself to just two:

1) Ali tries to denigrate the importance of fathers in children's lives by downplaying the numerous studies which show the vast differences in child well-being between single mother and two-parent households. She is correct that this difference is narrower when looking only at highly-educated, economically-secure mothers. However, the difference is still there.

2) Not all "well-being" can be measured by social scientists. Are there any adults who really believe that it won't matter to Sloan's 16-month-old boy that he doesn't have a father?

Ali's article is below.

Knocking Yourself Up--Some women laugh about turkey basters replacing Mr. Right. The ongoing debate over going it alone
By Lorraine Ali
Newsweek, 11/5/07

Sex And The City's" Carrie Bradshaw once asked, "What if Prince Charming had never shown up? Would Snow White have slept in that glass coffin forever? Or would she have eventually woken up, spit out the apple, gotten a job, a health-care package and a baby from her local neighborhood sperm bank?" Though it's hard to say how Disney would have grappled with a no-show prince, if Ms. White were to awaken alone today, it's possible she'd take the advice of Louise Sloan, author of the guidebook "Knock Yourself Up: A Tell-All Guide to Becoming a Single Mom."

Sloan found herself single at 41, though she'd always considered herself "definitely the marrying kind." Determined to become a mother, the Brooklyn-based writer inseminated herself with sperm from an unknown donor she refers to as No. 2, "a tall, handsome green-eyed actor (Favorite color: blue. Favorite pet: dogs)" in the attic of her conservative family's Kennebunkport, Maine, summer house. Sloan now has a 16-month-old son, and uses her experience--as well as those of almost 50 more unpartnered, educated and financially independent straight and gay females over 30--to propel her humorous "how to" book for aspiring single moms. She offers practical advice on choosing the right donor and informing prospective grandparents in chapters titled "Oops, I Forgot to Have a Baby" and "Trysts With the Turkey Baster"...

To read more and to discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

The American Coalition for Fathers and Children
The American Coalition for Fathers and Children is dedicated to creating a family law system which promotes equal rights for all parties affected by divorce. Contact the ACFC at 1-800-978-3237 or visit them on the web at www.acfc.org.

Parenting Plan Calendar Software
Shared Ground (R) is an easy-to-use software program designed for divorced parents to track their parenting plan schedules over many years. Do-it-yourself or let us build your approved parenting plan into a multi-year calendar so that you can print, share, or modify the calendar later. Parents, attorneys, arbitrators and mediators can generate equitable parenting plans, which is especially useful for parents seeking fair division of their children's time. FREE ASSISTANCE TO OUR CLIENTS- $49.95 one-time charge, FREE TRIAL & MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. Click here for more information.


In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part II)

Background: Conscientious Virginia judge James Michael Shull, who smoked out a woman who sought to extend a restraining order based on false charges of domestic violence, was just removed from the bench by this Virginia Supreme Court ruling.

To learn more about the case, see my blog post In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part I) or read my co-authored newspaper column defending Shull here.

Both the Virginia Supreme Court's opinion and the widely-disseminated Associated Press article by Larry O'Dell ignore the most important facts in this case and criticize Shull for the "coin toss" incident. According to the AP:

"According to the court, Shull admitted tossing a coin to determine which parent would have visitation with a child on Christmas. Shull said he was trying to encourage the parents to decide the issue themselves but later acknowledged that he was wrong."

What happened was this--a mother and father had shared physical custody of their children, and could not agree as to who would have them on Christmas Day. Shull urged them to come to an agreement themselves, but they were unable to. Normally at this point (or actually, long before it) the judge would've just decided to give the kids to mom for Christmas, but Shull told both parents that he considered both of them to be good, loving parents and that he did not want to have to choose between them.

When they were unable to decide, he decided to toss a coin to make the decision, sending a clear message that the court was not going to favor one parent over the other. I applaud Shull for this, yet, amazingly, this non-event is one of the major charges against him.

Also, according to Shull, the coin toss was not objected to by either of the two parties, both of whom were represented by attorneys. Shull determined who got the 1st week of Xmas vacation the first year, with vacation to be alternated thereafter.

The AP by O'Dell also says the Virginia Supreme Court's decision was "unanimous," which sounds impressive but is factually questionable. According to Shull:

"It is hard to say the opinion was 'unanimous.' The opinion was authored by Justice Keenan, but no one else signed on to it. It does not have any dissents, but in cases of this type, they sometimes do opinions in this manner to mask their differences because it's more politic."

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

A Legal Advocate for Fathers in Los Angeles & Ventura Counties
The Law Offices of Adam Michael Sacks, Esq., handles cases of all sizes with compassion, understanding, and a commitment to helping fathers protect themselves in a divorce. Don't assume anything and don't sign anything--call Adam Sacks, Esq. at 1-800-340-7320, or write him at adam@adamlawyer.com. www.adamlawyer.com (No relation)
FALSELY ACCUSED IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA?
If you've been falsely accused of domestic violence, sexual abuse, child molestation, or other crimes of a sexual nature, contact The Law Offices of Douglas R. Slain. Slain is a specialist who has worked for over 30 years to defend falsely accused men and fathers. To learn more, click here, or call 800-438-6820.

Single Mother by Choice Guru, Glenn Clash in UK Guardian

Background: Newsweek magazine writer Lorraine Ali quoted from my co-authored column Rise in Out-of-Wedlock Births Is Bad News for America's Kids (Washington Times, 12/4/06) in her recent piece Knocking Yourself Up--Some women laugh about turkey basters replacing Mr. Right. The ongoing debate over going it alone (Newsweek, 11/5/07). The piece centers around Louise Sloan, author of the new guidebook Knock Yourself Up: A Tell-All Guide to Becoming a Single Mom. Sloan now has a fatherless 16-month-old son. The piece favors women who decide to have fatherless children. To learn more, click here.

The liberal British UK Guardian, one of the world's premier newspapers, has a new piece out extolling the virtues of single motherhood by choice--There's no shame in going solo, says mum: Career women with eyes on their biological clocks now have a 'how to' guide to single parenting, but the topic is provoking a backlash in America (UK Guardian, Observer, 11/4/07). The article focuses on choice mom guru Louise Sloan. Needless to say, the article sympathizes with Sloan, and holds me up as an example of the "vehement" backlash against single mothers by choice.

The article says that Sloan is "shocked by the vehemence of the backlash" against her. She says:

"I think that if you have reservations or shame about having become a single mother and having chosen to be an alternative family in that way, that shame is going to be transmitted to the people you speak to about it. And it's also going to come through to your child...I think that it's really important to make sure that your child feels that the way he or she came into this world was a positive and happy thing. And so you need to have that attitude yourself. Also, in speaking about it to other people, if you present it as a weird, questionable thing, you're more likely to get a negative response."

The Guardian counterposes this with my comment:

"To openly advocate single motherhood as a lifestyle choice is to fail to understand how powerfully children hunger for their fathers and the immense benefits reaped by the children who do have fathers in their lives. This misunderstanding is very destructive. At the core of this work is a 'you go, girl' belief that mothers can do it alone and always know best. Unfortunately, many women are choosing this lifestyle and it's our children who are suffering for it."

The article also has a disturbing statistic near the bottom--one in seven birth certificates in England and Wales in 2006 had no father listed.

Sloan has now joined Rosanna Hertz, author of Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice, and Peggy Drexler, author of Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick Moms Are Creating the Next Generation of Exceptional Men, to form a troika of feminist gurus advocating voluntary single motherhood. To read my previous critique of Hertz and her book, see my co-authored column Are Single Mothers the 'New American Family?' (World Net Daily, 9/28/06). To see my previous critique of Drexler and her book, see my columns Are Boys Really Better off Without Fathers? (San Francisco Chronicle, 8/31/05) and Raising Boys Without Men: Lesbian Parents Good, Dads Bad (World Net Daily, 9/10/05).

To read more and to discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Fathers & Families: Advocacy for the Child-Father Bond
Fathers & Families is a non-profit organization advocating for the right of every child to have two parents. Called by some a "fathers' rights organization," Fathers & Families is made up of men and women who believe that fathers are an essential part of a child's life and that divorce or separation should not change this. www.FathersandFamilies.org 
FALSELY ACCUSED IN TEXAS?
Domestic Violence. Child Sexual Assault. Child Protective Services Defense.
Contact the Law Office of Stuckle & Ferguson
www.PaulStuckle.com / falseaccusations@stuckle-ferguson.com
Goldberg & Associates--the Parental Alienation Specialists
If you're the target of Parental Alienation, the Parental Alienation specialists at Goldberg & Associates can help. They operate throughout the U.S. and Canada and assist family law attorneys and targeted parents needing medical-legal consulting services related to Parental Alienation. Call them at 905.481.0367 or visit their website www.parentalalienation.ca.

In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part III)

Background: Conscientious Virginia judge James Michael Shull, who smoked out a woman who sought to extend a restraining order based on false charges of domestic violence, was just removed from the bench by this Virginia Supreme Court ruling.

To learn more about the case, see my blog posts In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part I) and In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part II), or read my co-authored newspaper column defending Shull here.

The Virginia Supreme Court's opinion criticizes Shull for "making an improper ex parte telephone call during a recess in the custody hearing to obtain information on a disputed factual matter" and that this "ex parte communication serves to illustrate again Judge Shull's lack of concern for litigants appearing before him."

Nothing could be further form the truth--Shull made the phone call out of concern for the litigants before him, principally the two young children whose placement he had to decide. Shull had to give the children either to the husband, who the wife claimed stabbed her, or the wife, who the husband claimed was a mentally-disturbed cutter.

In the case, Tammy G. claimed that her husband had stabbed her and that she went to a local emergency room for treatment. Shull's violation consisted of--brace yourself--calling the local hospital to confirm that Tammy G. had been admitted. Once again, Shull is in trouble for examining the facts in the case before him--he made the call as part of his duty to protect the G. children.

Shull also says that he informed everyone in the courtroom that he planned to do call before he made the call.

It is true that the Virginia Canons of Judicial Conduct states:

"A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding."

Shull says, "It is not uncommon for judges in the juvenile and domestic relations court to place telephone calls to ascertain the truth when resolving a factual dispute."

The Virginia Lawyers Weekly article JIRC: Censure or remove J&DR judge (5/28/07) contains an interesting tidbit about this issue. The lead judge in the court where Shull heard this case, Elizabeth S. Wills, "testified that she very seldom makes such calls."

"Seldom?" So Wills, who is Shull's boss and who is largely responsible for him being railroaded, admits to the Judicial Commission that she too has made the same kind of phone calls--the type of calls which Shull is in trouble for doing once and only once.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

HELP FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FATHERS
If you're a father in Northern California who's going through a divorce or its aftermath and need legal help, contact The Law Offices of Douglas R. Slain. Slain, a graduate of Stanford Law School, has over 30 years of experience in family law and criminal defense. He can help you protect your relationship with your kids and your finances. To learn more, click here, or call 800-438-6820.
Jeff Leving's New Book--Divorce Wars
Jeffery M. Leving, one of America's most prominent divorce lawyers, has written a new book on how to win any divorce fairly, even when your spouse brings out the heavy artillery. Divorce Wars: A Field Guide to the Winning Tactics, Preemptive Strikes, and Top Maneuvers When Divorce Gets Ugly provides essential advice on everything from picking the right lawyer and devising a winning settlement strategy to getting the most from your day in court and dealing with an ex-spouse. Divorce Wars is available here.
Help, Resources for Dads
The National Fathers' Resource Center is a division of Fathers For Equal Rights, Inc. (FER), located in Dallas, Texas, with offices in both Dallas and Houston. In existence for over three decades, it has services and resources for dads nationwide and is one of the largest and most active fathers' rights organizations in the U.S. www.fathers4kids.org

Feminist Writer Ann Friedman Has a Point

Feminist writer Ann Friedman, editor of the leading feminist blog www.feministing.com, has a point in her recent blog post "'Your Women Are Ugly!' is not a political argument." Friedman's blog post is a little overwrought, but she's right that comparisons such as that pictured are sexist.

I would also add that they're usually rigged, as in the poster (pictured) which she cites. Obviously anybody could find a group of attractive pictures of conservative women and unattractive pictures of liberal women--you could do the opposite just as easily.

It's also rigged because some of the pictures of the liberal women were chosen specifically because they make the person look bad. Susan Estrich is an attractive woman, but they picture her here at her absolute worst, as they do with Hillary Clinton.

But it's not the sexism of such arguments that bothers me as much as that they remind me of the way some kids taunt and humiliate each other on the schoolyard. I never wanted to participate in that cruelty as a child, and I've got no interest in participating in it as an adult.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Help for Midwest Fathers
Cordell & Cordell is one of the largest domestic relations firms for men in the Midwest, representing fathers in Missouri, Illinois, Texas, Kansas, Indiana and Georgia. Men who come to Cordell & Cordell know that their interests and the interests of their children will be aggressively championed. www.cordellcordell.com
Civil War - A Father's Guide to Winning Child Custody
Joseph E. Cordell's Civil War - A Father's Guide to Winning Child Custody  gives fathers clear, easy-to-understand tips on how to achieve the best results possible in a divorce. Comprehensive chapters explain every step of the divorce process, the meaning of legal terms, how courts determine custody, and how to maximize chances of victory at every stage. Cordell is the founder of Cordell & Cordell

From 'Diary of a Patient Man'--What Happens When a Male Victim of Domestic Violence Calls 911

I've often discussed the inequities against men in the domestic violence system. William Stoneking, a male victim of domestic violence, has experienced them. His book The Diary of a Patient Man, A Father's Struggle describes his fight to navigate through the DV and family law system to protect his relationship with his son.

In the excerpt below, Stoneking describes what happens when his former wife, who we will call "Susan," was physically attacking him and the police arrived. While Stoneking was not seriously injured by his wife's attacks, I find it hard to believe that the police would have treated the case the same way were the genders reversed.

Excerpted from The Diary of a Patient Man, A Father's Struggle
By William Stoneking

[After I questioned her on where our money was being spent] she attacked me, hitting my back, smacking the back of my head and trying to rip my arms off. Someone obviously had something to hide. She knocked me down on the bed and then onto the floor. I grabbed the phone and called 911...She had left some really nice marks on my arms and I was going to press charges of domestic battery. She hadn't changed her abusive behavior and the only way she'd change was to be arrested. I talked to the 911 operator and told her what was going on and that Susan was going ballistic.

I went downstairs to the front door with the cordless phone while I was talking to the dispatcher and the dispatcher told me that help would be on the way...

Two Kansas City squad cars arrived at my residence and I told them what was going on. I told them I wanted to press charges for domestic battery and they looked at the marks on my arm and told me that was 'incidental contact.' I was floored...The officers went and talked to her and she had no marks on her. They asked for my license and within a few minutes I was being placed under arrest...

To read more of this excerpt and to discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Families Against Confiscatory Child Support (FACCS)
FACCS is the national voice for fair and reasonable child support. FACCS believes all parents have an obligation to support their children financially. However, in high income cases, state and federal laws often result in excessive awards that are effectively alimony in disguise and have little to do with supporting children. Huge child support awards lead to protracted custody disputes, undermines co-parenting, and leaves children worse off financially. www.faccsonline.org / contact@faccsonline.org

Are You Paying Child Support for a Child Who May Not Be Yours?
RuDaddy Inc. offers a free case evaluation to men who are paying child support for children who may not be theirs. RuDaddy operates nationwide and is affordable and effective. Call them at 888-RUDADDY (888-783-2339), or email them at rudaddy@cox.net. www.rudaddy.com


Only Female Professional Baseball Umpire Released

Some of you may recall my blog post Will the First Woman Major League Umpire Improve Baseball? about female umpire Ria Cortesio (pictured), in which I speculated that a female umpire might help cut down on some of the asinine umpire blaming and baiting that goes on in baseball. My theory is that since the vast majority of men are gentlemen (though feminists will never admit it), a female umpire will be treated with far more courtesy than a male umpire.

Having watched some of the baseball playoffs with my father this year and witnessed several hitters deciding not to swing at borderline pitches with two strikes on them and then having the goddamned gall to blame the umpires for their strikeouts doesn't do anything to change my mind.

Anyway, unfortunately Cortesio was released recently, after receiving low ratings by minor league supervisors. According to the article She's out! Ria Cortesio, only female umpire in pro baseball, released (The Canadian Press, 10/31/07), "There are about 300 umpires in the majors and affiliated minors. Several minor league umps get released each off-season, with baseball trying to make a decision on their futures within a few years." The full article on her departure is here. My previous writings about her are below.

"Will the First Woman Major League Umpire Improve Baseball?"

It sounds like a typical mainstream media headline, right? The one what will tell you that women entering (name whichever profession) will improve it because women are better at (whatever job) than men because they're more (fill in adjectives and superlatives).

This time, however, you'd be wrong.

I'm the one who's actually saying that a woman umpire might improve baseball. Not because she'd be any better than the male umpires, because she wouldn't, although I'm sure we'll hear plenty of stories that she is. I think she might improve baseball because the players and managers will be less likely to act like jackasses with a woman umpire than a male umpire.

Whether playing baseball or watching it, it's always been a pet peeve of mine how asinine players and managers sometimes behave in relation to umpires. This exists in baseball at all levels. When I played baseball we could've been losing 11-1 in the 9th inning but I swear that half of the guys would be blaming a bad call by the umpire in the 3rd inning...

To read more and to discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Online Dating Rights
Online Dating Rights opposes the new federal International Marriage Broker Regulation Act, which requires Americans who seek to meet foreigners via the internet to have a criminal background check and an intrusive report about intimate details of one's life BEFORE any communication--the first time in US history that such checks have been required. www.onlinedatingrights.com
SAMSONLAW--Divorce Lawyers for Michigan Men & Fathers
If you're a Michigan man faced with divorce, you need SAMSONLAW on your side--SAMSONLAW defends men.
Smart Advocacy Means Stopping Oppression Now. INeedSamson.com
My Sara
My Sara
--How the Adoption Assistance Agency stole a baby girl away from her loving family and put her up for adoption, for a nice profit. To learn more about this incredible story, go to www.my-sara.com

You Be the Judge--NOW Claims This Ad Is 'Offensive to Women'--Is It? (Part VI)

Background: The National Organization for Women/NOW Foundation has launched a new campaign around ads which they label "Offensive to Women." The campaign involved Love Your Body Day 2007, which was October 18. In this series, I'm reprinting some of the ads which NOW tells us are "Offensive to Women," giving my own humble opinion on the matter and soliciting yours.

In You Be the Judge (Part I), I agreed with NOW. In Part II, I agreed with them on one out of two. In Part III, I thought they were wrong on both. In Part IV and also Part V, I agreed with NOW.

NOW protests this St. Pauli Girl ad. They write:

"A woman presented as a human beer bottle--now that should make you foam at the mouth. Once you've finished consuming her, should you just discard her like an empty beer bottle?"

I don't see anything wrong with this ad--the brand of beer is "St. Pauli Girl," so they have a picture of a beer that looks like a girl. There's nothing about "discarding her like an empty beer bottle," or whatever.

I disagree with NOW on this one, so that brings NOW's score, in my book, to 4 out of 8 correct.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Happily Un-married! Living Together & Loving It!
Living together is becoming widely accepted among all ages. Happily Un-married! is the first book to take a serious & non-judgmental look at helping these couples improve the fitness of their relationships. The rate of cohabitation is skyrocketing--10 million couples, 40% of whom have children. Happily Un-married! helps unmarried couples stabilize and strengthen their relationships. www.cohabitating.org
Help for Georgia Dads
Georgia attorney Edwin M. Saginar has 36 years of experience in family law and criminal defense, including domestic violence. He has seen many spouses falsely accuse their significant others of family violence, and knows how to defend your rights. www.edwinsaginar.com
Need Affordable Help with Child Support and Custody Issues?
Legal Services Centers of America provides fathers with affordable help in family law matters such as child support and child custody. Based in Colorado, they handle cases throughout the US. Call them at (719) 219-3561or write them at lscalegal@earthlink.net. www.legalservicecentersofamerica.com

Susan Faludi--'9/11 led to the disappearance and even demonization of independent female voices'

Feminist author Susan Faludi, author of the 1992 bestseller Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, has a new anti-male book out called The Terror Dream. According to attorney/blogger Doug Slain, Faludi asserts that "9/11 led to a 'peculiar urge to recast a martial attack as a domestic drama, attended by the disappearance and even demonization of independent female voices.'"

(Translation--in the wake of 9/11, the terrorism crisis, and the incredible heroism of New York City emergency personnel, men and masculinity did win back a small chunk of the respect and dignity that feminism had stripped away over the previous 30 years, and Faludi can't stand it.)

Read Slain's full blog post here.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Alicia M. Crowe's Real Dads Stand Up!
Alicia M. Crowe's new book Real Dads Stand Up! explains what every single father should know about child support, rights and custody. Learn how to exercise your legal rights, avoid 'baby mama drama', navigate the child support system, gain and maintain access to your children, and settle issues without going to trial. www.realdadsstandup.com

Fathers' Rights Legal Help
If you need help with divorce, child custody, child support, alimony and visitation issues, The Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. is one of the only law firms in the country focused almost exclusively on fathers' rights in divorce. Leving did heroic work on the Elian Gonzalez case, helping reunite Elian with his father. He also co-authored Illinois' Joint Custody Law, and was named one of "America's Best Lawyers" by Forbes Radio. Leving is the author of Fathers' Rights: Hard Hitting and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute. Call today for an initial consultation (312) 807-3990 or visit us on the web at www.dadsrights.com.


NOW Goes Up Against Victoria's Secret in Arizona Town

The local chapter of the National Organization for Women and other sympathizers battled Victoria's Secret over its advertising banner (pictured). Apparently Vicki Parry, 47, was traumatized, explaining, "There it was, bigger than life. These breasts towering over me."

Believe it or not, the story on this made Arizona's largest newspaper and several TV stations.

Victoria's Secret says it will change big posters
Mike Walbert and David van den Berg
The Arizona Republic
10/30/07

Bras, panties and the women modeling those items touched a nerve in the Gilbert community this week, sparking debate over sexy advertising and what's in good taste.

A small, yet vocal, group of patrons swayed the developer of Gilbert's new SanTan Village outdoor mall to pursue switching out multiple large pictures of scantily clad women found outside the Victoria's Secret lingerie store.

The mall officially opened last Friday near Williams Field Road and Loop 202.

Vicki Parry of Gilbert went to SanTan Village last weekend with her husband and the large images disturbed her.

"There it was, bigger than life. These breasts towering over me," Parry, 47, said.

Mall developer Westcor and Victoria's Secret are working to change the images at the store. No time has been set for when that will occur, other than as soon as reasonably possible, said Sheila Hunter, senior property manager with Westcor...

To read more and to discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Help for Los Angeles/Ventura County Dads
Certified Family Law Specialist Peter M. Walzer was one of the key figures in our successful legislative struggle to preserve the LaMusga move-away decision. As Chair of the State Bar of California Family Law Section Executive Committee, Walzer lobbied the state legislature to improve California laws on child support and child custody. He's an American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Fellow who has authored numerous articles on custody issues, business valuation in marital dissolutions and spousal and child support.  www.California-Divorce.com
The LaMusga Company
The LaMusga Company provides customized solutions to assist individuals and business owners in reaching their financial goals. The LaMusga Company is committed to helping you accomplish your long-term financial objectives. LaMusgaCo.com

I Discuss Our Elian II Campaign on the Maria Sanchez Show

Background: I recently partnered with Dr. Ned Holstein and Fathers & Families in a campaign to protest Florida Department of Children & Families' actions in the "Elian Gonzalez II" case in Miami. In that case, Rafael Izquierdo, a fit, loving father, has faced numerous obstacles to reunite with his 5-year-old daughter.

Thousands of you answered our call to action, and the campaign has been covered or cited in hundreds of newspapers. Florida DCF, to its credit, met with us.  To learn more or to join our campaign, click here

I discussed our Elian Gonzalez II Campaign on the Maria Sanchez Morning Show on KKZZ AM 1590 in Ventura, CA yesterday. The audio of the interview is available--to listen, click here.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Dr. Warren Farrell's Shared Parenting Evidence Kit--What You Need to Win Shared Physical Custody
Dr. Warren Farrell, a top expert on children of divorce now offers a complete evidence kit to help you win shared custody.  The DVDs, audio CD and electronic files summarize the best scientific research available collected over decades.  Scientific research has proven that children do far better with near equal time with both parents with minimal conditions.  This video set was developed to educate parents, judges, lawyers, psychologists and other divorce professionals. Most judges are doing exactly what is worst for children with sole-custody.  Submitted as evidence this will maximize your chances. Divorce Reform groups call(508) 381-1450 to use as fundraiser. www.BestInterestofChildren.org
Help for Michigan Dads
Michigan family law attorney Mindy L. Hitchcock has experience fighting for noncustodial parents against Michigan's abusive FOC. Her holistic approach to divorce gets results for her clients while avoiding the scorched earth approach to law that leaves families emotionally and financially devastated. Lady4Justice.com

'The divorce court allowed my ex-wife to get away with wiping out the bank accounts, leaving me to pay the $20,000 of debt she charged up'

We've often discussed how women are sometimes able to get away with practically anything in family court, and the letter below is another example. Part of the reason for this problem is the family law system's anti-father bias. Part of it is the negative societal image of men and fathers, particularly divorced dads. Part of it is that courts are often so jammed that judges don't have the time to make meaningful decisions. Part of it is judges' concern--legitimate, to a degree--that economically vulnerable women not be left unable to provide for themselves and their children after divorce or separation.

The letter below from Mike, a reader, provides a good example of the way some women try to scam men in family court, and the way the courts close their eyes to it. It was originally written in response to my blog post Welcome Home, Soldier--Dad Comes Back from Army in Iraq to Visit His Daughters, Is Jailed for Child Support.

Mike writes:

"I was a good, law-abiding citizen and a hard worker all my life. I struggled and sacrificed to get educated and provide a comfortable life for my family...throughout the four years of my divorce the courts allowed my ex-wife to get away with wiping out the bank accounts, leaving me to pay the $20,000 of debt she charged up, and pay all medical bills (including the ones for her colored contact lenses, which had no medical purpose other than to turn her eyes blue).

"The court further labeled me as a criminal and abuser through false allegations from my ex-wife, while also allowing the man she cheated with (a documented alcoholic and convicted felon with attempted murder and vehicular homicide on his record) to move in with her and my young son.

"To add insult to injury, the court made me pay all the bills in the house (including the electricity of which they kept the lights, air-conditioning, and pool heater on 24x7; and the phone, where they got every feature and made daily calls overseas). The court also gave her my only car, even though she bought both herself and her boyfriend new cars from the money she got when she wiped out our bank account (my life savings).

"In the end the court turned a blind eye to the daily abuse my ex and her boyfriend would inflict on our son, while justifying her refusal to give me court ordered visitation with the myth that I am probably the abuser. Best of all, they allowed my son to be abused (even to this day) with the justification that it is in the 'best interest of the child.'

"These days I'm in a job I hate. Normally, I would just quit, cut down on expenses, and find something new. However, since I pay child support voluntarily quitting a job can well put me in jail."

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

The Diary of a Patient Man--How a Male DV Victim Fought the System and Fought for His Child
William Stoneking's The Diary of a Patient Man is the compelling and inspirational true story of a father's fight for his child against a violent ex-wife and a biased court system that tried to drive him away. Get it online or order your copy here.
Are you or someone you love being abused?
The Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women provides crisis intervention and support services to victims of domestic violence and their families in order to help survivors recover from the trauma of domestic violence. Contact them by clicking here.

Elian II Campaign Update: Florida Governor Charlie Crist Sends Letter to Protesters

Background: I recently partnered with Dr. Ned Holstein and Fathers & Families in a campaign to protest Florida Department of Children & Families' actions in the "Elian Gonzalez II" case in Miami. In that case, Rafael Izquierdo, a fit, loving father, has faced numerous obstacles to reunite with his 5-year-old daughter.

Thousands of you answered our call to action, and the campaign has been covered or cited in hundreds of newspapers. Florida DCF, to its credit, met with us last week. To learn more or to join our campaign, click here.

Florida Governor Charlie Crist (pictured) has sent out the letter below to those who have joined our protest campaign. We knew, of course, that he couldn't discuss the Izquierdo case directly, but our larger concern is the child welfare system's disregard for fathers, an issue Crist's letter doesn't address.

To be fair, I'll give Crist credit for responding, and also for acknowledging to the press that it has been a sizeable protest campaign. I suspect that one reason DCF has acted as it has is that Governor Crist seeks the loyalty, votes, and campaign donations of the large Cuban-American community. Crist (correctly) sees defeating Rafael Izquierdo and keeping his five-year-old girl in the US against his will as a way to win Cuban-American votes. In Florida, sticking it to Cuba's government is a crowd-pleaser, similar to the way politicians win popularity by beating up on "deadbeat dads."

Crist's letter is below.

Izquierdo Child Custody Case

Thank you for contacting Governor Charlie Crist. The Governor appreciates your concerns about the Izquierdo child custody case and asked me to respond on his behalf.
 
Governor Crist wants to know how people feel about the many critical issues we face. Rest assured, the Governor is committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of all children in Florida. The Department of Children and Families is charged with assisting abused and neglected children. The department does this by providing support services to children and their families, and, in some cases, by providing a place outside of the home for children to live while their family problems are resolved in the courts.
 
Governor Crist appreciates your sharing suggestions for changes to the department's procedures. It is our understanding the Department of Children and Families has communicated with Dr. Ned Holstein to discuss these very issues.
 
Thank you again for contacting the Governor's office. Please do not hesitate to write in the future to share your concerns about issues that are important to you.
 
Sincerely,
 
Warren Davis
Office of Citizen Services

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.
 

Are You the Target of Parental Alienation?
Parental alienation cases are among the most difficult and complicated in family law. J. Michael Bone, Ph.D., is an expert on parental alienation. If you're a target parent, he can help you get back into your children's lives. Bone has worked as a custody evaluator and as a therapist and knows how to help the court find the truth. His services are available throughout the U.S. Dr. Bone can be reached by phone at (407) 645-0662 or by email by clicking here. www.jmbconsulting.org
 
  Help for Colorado Dads
As someone who has personally experienced the heartbreak of divorce and family breakup, Brett W. Martin, Esq. works to advance the interests and concerns of fathers in domestic and family law litigation. Personal attention is given to clients to help them through a very difficult time in their lives. www.brettwmartin.com

Husband's an Idiot in Kohler TV Commercial

This ad for Kohler bathroom fixtures is funny, but, as I've said many times before, the "man as idiot" theme got old a long, long time ago.

On the positive side, I wish my plumber looked like that...

To watch the commercial, click here.

To watch some other videos of "dad as idiot" TV commercials, click here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, or here.

To see ads that the National Organization for Women considers to be offensive to women, click here.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

My Family Has Two Houses...and I'm Okay
A workshop for children of separation or divorce in a workbook! In the privacy of your own home, you can provide your child with a safe way of looking at their thoughts and feelings and help to open discussion of relevant issues for them with you. This workbook can make the difference between your child surviving your divorce and thriving despite it! To learn more about My family has two houses ...and I'm Okay! and to order, click here.

How to Win Shared Custody
Here are the litigation secrets to winning shared physical & legal custody from Boston trial lawyer  Nick Palermo, Esquire  who has won these cases for 24 years.  It costs $5,000 or more in legal fees to gain the knowledge and guidance contained in this $10 handbook--The Ten Essential Elements to Winning Joint Shared Physical and Legal Custody. www.TenEssentialElements.com


Deadbeat Abandons Child

Oops, I'm sorry, I forgot--only fathers can be deadbeats. This mother who abandoned her child is not a "deadbeat" for leaving her baby at a hospital. She can walk out of the newborn girl's life without owing any responsibility to the child she created. In fact, if anything, she's a victim.

The article says, "[Indiana's Safe Haven Law] The parents do not have to identify themselves or explain their actions as long as the baby is unharmed." "Parents"? So a dad who doesn't want to take responsibility for a baby can simply take the baby to the hospital and wash his hands of all responsibility the way moms do? No, sir...

I am not without sympathy for women, particularly young women, who face unwanted pregnancies. What I oppose is society's severe gender double standard on the issue.

Woman leaves newborn at hospital
By Vic Ryckaert
Indianapolis Star, 10/31/07
vic.ryckaert@indystar.com

Police say a woman left a newborn girl with a worker at an Eastside hospital this week.

The woman, apparently the child's mother, stopped a Community East Hospital employee in the parking lot and handed the worker the baby girl bundled in blankets at about 12:45 p.m. on Monday, according to an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police report.

"The unidentified female then stated the baby had just been born (and) that she could not take care of it," Marion County Sheriff's Department Special Deputy

Thomas O'Daniel wrote in his report.

Hospital worker Karen Fisher brought the child to the hospital's nursery.

The baby is in the care of Child Protective Services, police said.

Indiana's Safe Haven Law allows a parent who cannot care for an infant younger than 45 days old to leave the baby with staff at hospitals, police stations and firehouses. The parents do not have to identify themselves or explain their actions as long as the baby is unharmed.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.

Parental-Alienation-Awareness.com
Stop Parental Alienation--a terrible form of Child Abuse. Eight states have now officially recognized Parental Alienation Awareness Day. To learn more, go to Parental-Alienation-Awareness.com.
Think of Your Light Switch as an ATM Machine
Wouldn't you like to get paid every time you turn on the power?  Find out how you can get paid on thousands of electric bills each month by clicking here.
You Be the Judge--NOW Claims This Ad Is 'Offensive to Women'--Is It? (Part V)

Background: The National Organization for Women/NOW Foundation has launched a new campaign around ads which they label "Offensive to Women." The campaign involved Love Your Body Day 2007, which was October 18. In this series, I'm reprinting some of the ads which NOW tells us are "Offensive to Women," giving my own humble opinion on the matter and soliciting yours.

In You Be the Judge (Part I), I agreed with NOW. In Part II, I agreed with them on one out of two. In Part III, I thought they were wrong on both. In Part IV, I agreed with NOW.

NOW (successfully) protested  this Dolce & Gabbana. They write:

"This ad is beyond offensive, with a scene evoking a gang rape and reeking of violence against women. In an interview, NOW Foundation President Kim Gandy said, 'It's in Esquire, so they probably don't think a stylized gang rape will sell clothes to women, but what is more likely is that they think it will get them publicity. It's a provocative ad but it is provoking things that really are not what we want to have provoked. We don't need any more violence.'"

I agree that it evokes a gang rape. You get no sense of lightheartedness in either the woman or the men, nor any sense that the woman is enjoying herself. One could argue that "gang rape" is an excessive interpretation, but I asked myself this--"If an ad were to evoke gang rape, what would it look like?" The answer, for me, is "probably a lot like this."

I'm with NOW on this one, so that brings NOW's score, in my book, to 4 out of 7 correct.

To discuss this issue on my blog, click here.