20 Years in Prison for Failing to Pay Child
Support?The article below is illustrative
of the problems with the child support system in
many ways:
1) I've often made the point that when we jail
or threaten to jail child support debtors and they
pay money to stay out of jail, this money often
is not theirs but instead money they've borrowed
from their family and friends. Yet inevitably whatever
chest-thumping/publicity-seeking DA who's behind
the latest crackdown will tell you, "See? The deadbeats
have the money and the threat of jail makes them
pay!"
In this article, a judge is admitting
that threatening to jail people means they borrow
money from family members to stay out. He's admitting
that they don't have the money to pay themselves,
and that they're being jailed for inability to pay
their debts. In other words, debtor's prison.
2) I'm not sure if we have any Father of the
Year candidates in this article, but most of the
"deadbeats" certainly seem to be low-income men
whose ability to pay is questionable. We're told
two of their occupations--one is a roofer, the other
is a construction worker--and both claim they're
having a hard time finding work. One of them says
that the fact that his driver's license was suspended
for nonpayment of child support has made it more
difficult to find work.
3) Most notable is the article's assertion that
Andrew Tayrien was sentenced to "20 years in prison
for non-support, a class B felony." Twenty
years? Is that a misprint?
4) The article mentions the Arkansas Department
of Finance & Administration's Office of Child Support
Enforcement's new top Child Support Evaders list,
which can be found
here. Of the six listed, the biggest "deadbeat"
is a waitress. We also have one youth camp worker
and four people who are so successful in their careers
that the DFA doesn't even know what their occupations
are.
Oh, and tell me, when they catch the waitress,
are they going to sentence her to 20 years
in prison?
The piece is below. Tracy M. Neal, who wrote
it, doesn't seem to understand the implications
of the facts in her own article--she can be reached
at tracyn@nwanews.com.
Thanks to child support expert
Jane Spies
of the National Family Justice Association for sending
me the article. Jane discusses problems with the
child support system in her recent article
The Myth of the Successful Child Support System.
SUNDAY
FOCUS : Big child-support bills could result in
jail time
By Tracy M. Neal Staff Writer /
tracyn@nwanews.com
November 11, 2007
BENTONVILLE -- Child support or jail.
That was the rule Circuit Judge Xollie Duncan
stressed to people recently as they were called
before her for failure to pay child support.
Duncan and Circuit Judge John Scott set aside
a day each month to hear such cases.
" The rule is you pay child support or you go
to jail, " Duncan said to Richard McKeever. " You
understand that. "
McKeever was arrested for failure to pay child
support. He owes more than $ 23, 500. He claims
he works part time in a construction job and received
$ 215 several days ago.
" I've been trying to make enough to live, "
McKeever told the judge.
McKeever claims he works with an acquaintance
who drove him to job sites. McKeever is hampered
from finding a better job because he lost his driver's
license -- one of the punishments for his failure
to pay child support...
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
 |
The American Coalition for
Fathers and Children
The American Coalition for
Fathers and Children is
dedicated to creating a
family law system which
promotes equal rights for
all parties affected by
divorce. Contact the ACFC
at 1-800-978-3237 or visit
them on the web at
www.acfc.org. |
|
Parenting
Plan Calendar Software
Shared Ground (R) is
an easy-to-use software
program designed for divorced
parents to track their parenting
plan schedules over many
years. Do-it-yourself or
let us build your approved
parenting plan into a multi-year
calendar so that you can
print, share, or modify
the calendar later. Parents,
attorneys, arbitrators and
mediators can generate equitable
parenting plans, which is
especially useful for parents
seeking fair division of
their children's time. FREE
ASSISTANCE TO OUR CLIENTS-
$49.95 one-time charge,
FREE TRIAL & MONEY-BACK
GUARANTEE. Click
here for more information.
|
|
|
FOX Houston Does Special on Child Support & Custodial
Dads
 
Some of you may remember several weeks ago in
one of my
weekly E-newsletters I asked for Texas custodial
dads who receive or are supposed to receive child
support. Many of you responded--so many, in fact,
that the Houston FOX affiliate on whose behalf I
wrote the notice told me they had to have a "cattle
call" of all the dads. FOX ended up using three
of the dads in the show (pictured above), and they
spoke about their situations and their struggles.
While I have no complaint about what's in the
show's clip of me, the totality of my interview
was more nuanced. In the interview, I also pointed
to the many problems with the child support system,
and explained that noncustodial moms sometimes fall
victim to them just like noncustodial dads often
do.
To watch the FOX special, which aired in Houston
on Monday, November 5, click
here. (Warning, it may take a few seconds to
load.)
To write Emmy Award winning reporter
Melinda Spaulding, who put the special together,
click here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
A Legal Advocate for Fathers
in Los Angeles & Ventura
Counties
The Law Offices of Adam
Michael Sacks, Esq., handles
cases of all sizes with
compassion, understanding,
and a commitment to helping
fathers protect themselves
in a divorce. Don't assume
anything and don't sign
anything--call Adam Sacks,
Esq. at 1-800-340-7320,
or write him at
adam@adamlawyer.com.
www.adamlawyer.com (No
relation) |
 |
FALSELY ACCUSED
IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA?
If you've been
falsely accused of domestic
violence, sexual abuse,
child molestation, or other
crimes of a sexual nature,
contact
The Law Offices of Douglas
R. Slain. Slain is a
specialist who has worked
for over 30 years to defend
falsely accused men and
fathers. To learn
more, click
here,
or call 800-438-6820. |
|
|
Head of DCF's Miami Division Says They're 'Reviewing
in Detail' Report on Child Welfare System's Disregard
of Fathers
Background:
I recently partnered with Dr. Ned Holstein
and
Fathers
& Families in a campaign to protest
Florida Department of Children & Families' actions
in the "Elian Gonzalez II" case in Miami. In that
case, Rafael Izquierdo, a fit, loving father, has
faced numerous obstacles to reunite with his 5-year-old
daughter.
In our letters and faxes to Florida DCF,
we asked that they contact Dr. Holstein and meet
with him to discuss the issues put forward in our
protest. In the photo, Dr. Holstein shakes hands
with Gilda Ferradaz, head of DCF's Miami division.
Dr. Holstein met with Ferradaz, Mary Cagle, DCF's
Director of Child Welfare Legal Services, and other
DCF officials last week. In addition, Dr. Holstein
met with embattled Cuban father Rafael Izquierdo.
To learn more about our campaign, click
here.
Dr. Holstein and I had urged DCF to examine the
Urban Institute's recent report What About the
Dads? Child Welfare Agencies' Efforts to Identify,
Locate, and Involve Nonresident Fathers, which
studied the foster care systems of four states.
The report contains a shocking finding: when fathers
inform child welfare officials that they would like
their children to live with them, the agencies seek
to place the children with their fathers in only
15% of cases.
In Ferradaz's letter below, she says that DCF
will "review in detail" the Urban Institute report.
Changing a misguided bureacracy's policies can be
a Sisyphean effort, but, to be fair, DCF has in
general responded to our campaign in a meaningful
and intelligent manner.
Ferradaz wrote:
"Thank you for your correspondence to Florida
Governor Charlie Crist and the leadership of the
Department of Children and Families regarding a
Miami child custody case.
"Your willingness to raise your voice shows your
compassion for the well-being of children in our
state. As requested in your correspondence, Department
of Children and Families leadership contacted Dr.
Ned Holstein, President of Fathers and Families,
and met with him on October 24, 2007 to hear his
concerns. Dr. Holstein shared with us the report
prepared by the Urban Institute which you cite in
your email and we will review it in detail. Please
be assured that the best interest of the child is
always the primary concern of this Department.
"We thank you for bringing your concerns to our
attention.
"Gilda P. Ferradaz,
Circuit Administrator"
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Anti-Male Texas Domestic Violence Proposition Approved
by VotersBackground: In my co-authored
column,
From a Felony to a Phone Call: Texas Prop 13 Will
Allow Innocent Men to Be Jailed Without Bail
(Ft. Worth Star-Telegram,
Austin-American Statesman, 10/22/07), Mike
McCormick, Executive Director of the
American Coalition
for Fathers and Children, and I criticized a
Texas Proposition which drew wide support from many
state newspapers. Unfortunately, our column was
the only published opposition I saw, against a slew
of editorials and op-eds in favor.
Reflecting again the weakness of our movement,
Proposition 13 passed with Texas voters by a
wide margin on Tuesday. Proposition 13 is a dangerous
measure which will harm innocent men by greatly
eroding the rights of those accused of domestic
violence. The measure grants judges the ability
to hold without bail those accused of nonviolent,
trivial, or accidental violations of temporary restraining
orders.
Under current Texas law, the only defendants
ineligible for bail are those accused of capital
crimes. In addition, judges are provided discretion
to deny bail to those who have been both charged
with a felony and convicted or indicted for a previous
felony. To deny bail, there must be "evidence substantially
showing the guilt of the accused."
Prop 13 obliterates this, and opens the road
for many innocent men to be held without bail. Like
many states, Texas has adopted aggressive arrest
procedures on domestic violence calls. The result
has been that men are sometimes arrested for misdemeanor
domestic violence based on thin evidence. After
the arrest, Emergency Protective Orders are entered
against the accused, typically barring him from
going home or having any contact with his children.
Fathers can violate the orders by innocent acts
such as calling their own children, accidentally
running into them and their mother in the mall,
or going to their Little League games.
Under Prop 13, judges will have the power to
incarcerate without bail men who violate their EPOs.
Moreover, the Proposition lowers the evidence standard
from Substantial Showing to Preponderance of the
Evidence, which can rapidly degenerate into a "he
said/she said" contest that men usually lose.
Even worse, Prop 13 also encourages the legislature
to pass a law which would allow fathers who violate
temporary ex parte protective orders to
be jailed without bail. Women can obtain these orders
by claiming their male partners abused them, and
the men are then booted out of their own homes without
ever having a chance to defend themselves in court.
To learn more about Proposition 13, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
HELP FOR
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
FATHERS
If you're
a father in Northern
California who's
going through a
divorce or its aftermath
and need legal help,
contact
The Law Offices
of Douglas R. Slain.
Slain, a graduate
of Stanford Law
School, has over
30 years of experience
in family law and
criminal defense.
He can help you
protect your relationship
with your kids and
your finances.
To learn
more, click
here,
or call 800-438-6820. |
Jeff Leving's New
Book--Divorce
Wars
Jeffery M. Leving,
one of America's
most prominent divorce
lawyers, has written
a new book on how
to win any divorce
fairly, even when
your spouse brings
out the heavy artillery.
Divorce Wars: A
Field Guide to the
Winning Tactics,
Preemptive Strikes,
and Top Maneuvers
When Divorce Gets
Ugly provides
essential advice
on everything from
picking the right
lawyer and devising
a winning settlement
strategy to getting
the most from your
day in court and
dealing with an
ex-spouse.
Divorce Wars
is available
here. |
Help, Resources
for Dads
The
National Fathers'
Resource Center
is a division of
Fathers For Equal
Rights, Inc.
(FER), located in
Dallas, Texas, with
offices in both
Dallas and Houston.
In existence for
over three decades,
it has services
and resources for
dads nationwide
and is one of the
largest and most
active fathers'
rights organizations
in the U.S.
www.fathers4kids.org
|
|
|
|
You Be the Judge--NOW Claims This Ad Is 'Offensive
to Women'--Is It? (Part VII)
Background:
The National Organization for Women/NOW Foundation
has launched a new campaign around ads which they
label "Offensive to Women." The campaign involved
Love Your Body Day 2007, which was October 18. In
this eight-part series, I'm reprinting some of the
ads which NOW tells us are "Offensive to Women,"
giving my own humble opinion on the matter and soliciting
yours.
In
You
Be the Judge (Part I), I agreed with NOW. In
Part
II, I agreed with them on one out of two. In
Part
III, I thought they were wrong on both.
In
Part IV and also
Part
V, I agreed with NOW. In
Part
VI, I disagreed with NOW.
NOW protests this Paul Mitchell ad. They write:
"What?!? Even our hair has to be super skinny
now? Come on!"
I don't see anything wrong with this ad--the
girl isn't excessively thin or anything, and I guess
"skinny" is a way to condition your hair, or something.
(Yes, I did do my research--I asked my wife, who
didn't know what they meant, either.)
I disagree with NOW on this one, so that brings
NOW's score, in my book, to 4 out of 9 correct.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Did Mary Winkler also plan to kill her children?
Background:
Mary Winkler--who shot her husband in the back and
then refused to aid him or call 911 as he slowly
bled to death for 20 minutes--walked away a free
woman last month after serving a farcically brief
"sentence" for her crimes. She is currently in a
custody battle with Matthew Winkler's parents, who
have been raising their three daughters for the
last 18 months.
The Winklers seek to terminate Mary Winkler's
parental rights and adopt the girls. I support their
position.
To learn more about this horrendous injustice,
see my co-authored column
No child custody for husband-killer Mary Winkler
(World Net
Daily, 9/14/07), or click
here.
In the new article below, District Attorney Michael
Dunavant asserts that Mary Winkler also intended
to kill her three young children and herself. He
says:
"I would suggest to you that the evidence was
clear that not only did she make up her mind that
she was going to kill him when she did, but she
was going to end it for her children and herself,
too.
"[When Winkler left the state after shooting
her husband in the back in their bed, she had] less
than $200 in cash, a pair of socks for her baby,
a shotgun and a box of shells in a minivan. That's
it...She drove hundreds of miles to Jackson, Mississippi,
spent one night, and then to Orange Beach, Alabama,
and was in a hotel the next night. She was running
out of money. How was she going to feed her children?
How was she going to get back to Tennessee?
"You know what she was going to do. She was going
to kill her children and herself, and she was just
going to do it at the beach instead of in Selmer,
Tennessee."
The full article can be seen at
DA says Winkler aimed to kill kids (Jackson
Sun, 11/11/07). As critical as I am of Mary
Winkler, I don't find the DA's assertion terribly
convincing. If Winkler really wanted to kill her
children and kill herself, she could have done it
in the house after she killed her husband. It's
certainly possible that this is how things would
have turned out in Alabama, but I hardly think we
could be sure what she was going to do, as this
DA implies.
This might be a good example to help explain
one reason (of many) why men commit more murder-suicides
than women do. While in Alabama, Winkler probably
thought that even if she is caught, she still has
a chance to bamboozle the legal system and get off,
as in fact she was able to do.
By contrast, a man in her situation would know
that he was doomed, that there was no chance for
him to get off through the system, and would be
more likely to end it all with a murder-suicide.
This in no way excuses it for either gender, of
course.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|

|
Families Against Confiscatory Child
Support (FACCS)
FACCS is the national voice for
fair and reasonable child support.
FACCS believes all parents have
an obligation to support their children
financially. However, in high income
cases, state and federal laws often
result in excessive awards that
are effectively alimony in disguise
and have little to do with supporting
children. Huge child support awards
lead to protracted custody disputes,
undermines co-parenting, and leaves
children worse off financially.
www.faccsonline.org /
contact@faccsonline.org
|
|
Fathers
& Families News Digest, 11-12-07
Below
are some recent articles and items of interest from
Fathers & Families' latest News Digest.
Mills is dumped by divorce lawyers (San
Francisco Chronicle, 11-9-07)
Michael Jordan finally speaks about divorce
(Chicago Sun-Times, 11-9-07)
Broward residents can now go online to file for
divorce, small claims (South Florida Sun-Sentinel,
11-12-07)
Ex-NBA player with at least 8 kids files for bankruptcy
(Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 11-11-07)
Becker's child custody triumph (The Sun,
11-9-07)
Male domestic violence victims increase (East
Anglian Daily Times, 11-6-07)
Cate Edwards: on the Trail for Dad (Associated
Press, 11-11-07)
Brooklyn woman stabs father of child to death
(WNBC, 11-12-07)
Father finally figures into her life (Fay
Observer, 11-12-07)
Like father, like son for Broads (Times
Online, 11-11-07)
Reflections on Veterans Day (Part I)
Veterans'
Day 2007 was the 89th anniversary of the end of
one of the greatest tragedies in human history--World
War I. My grandfather volunteered for the War, and
was wounded in the decisive Battle of the Argonne
Forest in 1918. He was awarded the Purple Heart
and the French Croix de Guerre.
A couple years ago, feminist Helen Caldicott,
co-founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility,
made a speech called "Men: Natural Born Killers."
Caldicott told feminist antiwar demonstrators that
the male of the human species has unbridled bloodlust,
explaining that "young men rushed off to battle
in the first World War. So eager were they to participate
in the noble act of killing that they lied about
their age."
Actually, my grandfather lied about his age so
he could join the army, wanting to show his gratitude
to the country which had allowed him to escape foreign
tyranny. Caldicott is certainly correct that the
war was a senseless slaughter, and the Russian revolutionary
Lenin was correct that it was an imperialist war.
But unlike Caldicott, I believe that men go to war
out of a sense of duty and obligation, not bloodlust,
as Caldicott maintains. I criticized Caldicott in
my column
Dr. Helen Caldicott Spits on My Grandfather
(Cybercast News Service, 3/28/03). I wrote:
"According to Caldicott, societies dominated
by 'male values' approve of violence and killing,
and she criticizes women for being 'absolute wimps'
who 'condone [male] psychotic behavior by their
silence.' She ignores the fact that, rightly or
wrongly, American women support this country's wars
as much or nearly as much as men do. According to
a Washington Post/ABC poll conducted on Sunday,
March 23, 78 percent of men and 66 percent of women
support the current war. When the United States
went to war against Iraq in 1991, 87 percent of
men and 78 percent of women approved.
"Caldicott also ignores the fact that women have
always played a crucial role in ensuring that men
serve in wars. As men's issues author Warren Farrell
notes, during the Civil War Southern women 'hissed
and groaned' at male civilians. According to historian
Ken Burns, few Southern men tried to hire substitutes
to fight for them because the Southern women 'wouldn't
permit it.' During World War I, women in the capitals
of the warring cities of Europe would hand civilian
men flowers to show that they viewed them as cowards
for not enlisting...
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
 |
Online Dating Rights
Online Dating Rights
opposes the new federal
International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act, which requires
Americans who seek to meet
foreigners via the internet
to have a criminal background
check and an intrusive report
about intimate details of
one's life BEFORE any communication--the
first time in US history
that such checks have been
required.
www.onlinedatingrights.com
|
|
|
Reflections on Veterans Day (Part II)
Background:
Veterans' Day 2007 was the 89th anniversary of the
end of one of the greatest tragedies in human history--World
War I. My grandfather volunteered for the War, and
was wounded in the decisive Battle of the Argonne
Forest in 1918. He was awarded the Purple Heart
and the French Croix de Guerre. My previous post
about him was
Reflections
on Veterans Day (Part I).
Because Veterans Day began as a way to celebrate
the end of World War I on November 11, 1918, and
because my maternal grandfather fought in World
War I, I always think of him on Veterans Day.
He is pictured to the right, with me as a baby sitting
on his lap. My parents moved to California shortly
before I was born, so for many years I did not see
my grandfather very often. Also, my grandmother
was very sick, and my grandfather had to take care
of her.
My grandfather was a milkman during the Great
Depression. My mother was born prematurely, always
had health problems, and was sick a lot when she
was a little girl. My mother has often told me how
her father would stay up at night with her, comforting
her during her fevers and illnesses, even though
he himself had to report to work very, very early.
Many of the labor unions were built during the
1930s, and they were built because working people
sacrificed and risked their lives to build them.
Back then, companies sometimes hired thugs to crush
strikers and unions. Often the police played the
same role. To read one example, see my blog post
about the
famous
"Battle of Deputies Run" in 1934.
My grandfather was a poor, uneducated immigrant
who believed in the labor unions and supported their
strikes. My mother used to tell me stories of how
when there was a strike she and her brother, sister,
and mother waited anxiously for my grandfather to
come home, not knowing if he would.
My grandfather reappeared in my life when I was
about 10 and he moved closer to us. He and
I really connected, and I was crazy about him.
I loved to go over to his house, and I was so happy
to have re-discovered him. Then, it seemed
like almost right away, he contracted cancer, and
he died. I can still remember my mother telling
me about it, and not believing that it could be
true. Perhaps it sounds petty, but 30+ years
later I am still a little bitter about it--I loved
him so much.
It is also interesting to think back on how a
child process all of this. I really did not
believe he was dead, I kept thinking he was going
to come back. When we had the funeral and
there was an open casket, he looked very life-like,
which reinforced my belief. I can still remember
my mother telling me that they had replaced his
blood with embalming fluid. It was at that
moment that I finally, finally understood that my
grandfather was not coming back.
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
In Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part VI)--Legal
Professionals Who Worked with Shull Speak Out
Background: Conscientious Virginia judge James
Michael Shull, who smoked out a woman who sought
to extend a restraining order based on false charges
of domestic violence, was just removed from the
bench by
this Virginia Supreme Court ruling.
Not only was Shull railroaded, but he has been the
target of widely-disseminated lazy, misleading reporting
by the Associated Press, the New York Post,
and others.
To learn more about the case, see my blog
posts
In
Defense of Judge James Michael Shull (Part I),
Part
II,
Part
III,
Part
IV, and
Part
V, or read my co-authored newspaper column defending
Shull
here.
Several dozen legal and mental health professionals
who worked with Judge Shull wrote to the Judicial
Inquiry and Review Commission earlier this year
testifying to Judge Shull's good character and conduct
as a judge. Below we quote from a few of them.
Lana R. Mullins, MSW, on Judge Shull:
"In regards to his professional behavior it has
been my observations that he has researched and
familiarized himself with the laws pertaining to
the Juvenile Court and has worked very hard to properly
administer foster care and child protective services
cases. Judge Shull has demonstrated an understanding
of the crisis-oriented response DSS must make in
certain cases and haw made himself available for
emergency hearings as needed. In my experience,
Judge Shull has been fair in his decisions and above
all has considered the overall safety of the children
before his court."
Read Ms. Mullins' full letter
here.
Attorney Daisy N. Compton on Judge Shull:
"Since Judge Shull was appointed to the bench
about four years ago I have been before him on various
cases in the Scott County J&DR District Court on
at least a weekly basis...On a professional level
I have the highest regard for Judge Shull who has
proved to me to be a good judge who has made good
decisions when faces with those most difficult of
family situations that we are all familiar with
in the J&DR courts."
"As a matter of fact, my sister, who is employed
by my office part-time as a legal secretary, and
I, have often commented on his most courteous of
manners and demeanor as a 'perfect Southern gentleman,'
to all persons in public."
Read Ms. Compton's full letter
here.
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
|
Alicia M. Crowe's Real Dads Stand
Up!
Alicia M. Crowe's new book Real
Dads Stand Up! explains what
every single father should know
about child support, rights and
custody. Learn how to exercise your
legal rights, avoid 'baby mama drama',
navigate the child support system,
gain and maintain access to your
children, and settle issues without
going to trial.
www.realdadsstandup.com |
|
Fathers' Rights Legal Help
If you need help with divorce, child
custody, child support, alimony
and visitation issues,
The Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving,
Ltd. is one of the only law
firms in the country focused almost
exclusively on fathers' rights in
divorce. Leving did heroic work
on the Elian Gonzalez case, helping
reunite Elian with his father. He
also co-authored Illinois' Joint
Custody Law, and was named one of
"America's Best Lawyers" by Forbes
Radio. Leving is the author of
Fathers' Rights: Hard Hitting and
Fair Advice for Every Father Involved
in a Custody Dispute. Call
today for an initial consultation
(312) 807-3990 or visit us on the
web at
www.dadsrights.com.
|
|
OK, Mom Let the Child Die, but at Least
They Didn't Give the Dad Custody
The
mother didn't want the child, had attempted
suicide before, was "struggling with the
responsibilities of motherhood," and dad
wanted custody. The solution, of course,
is for mom to have custody, at least until
the baby dies...
Make sure to watch the TV report on the
page with the article--it's all about how
mom feels, how mom struggled,
how sad this whole thing is for mom--even
though mom left her little boy in the car
for 7 hours without checking on him
while she worked at Hooters.
Oh, and don't miss the Arizona State
University newspaper editorial
Opinions: For some mothers, it's a no-win
situation, which defends Duchene and
blames the US' lack of "socialized
childcare" for the little boy's death.
Father of child who died in hot car wanted
full custody
November 1, 2007
3TV and azfamily.com
Court documents reveal that the father
of a toddler left in a hot car on Tuesday
wanted full custody of his son.
The boy's mother, Ashly Duchene, was
arrested on one count of negligent homicide
early Wednesday morning.
Duchene is still being closely watched,
and it's possible that she might have been
transferred from Fourth Avenue Jail to another
facility.
Police said Duchene left her 17-month-old
son, Ryan Gallagher, in his car seat in
her hot car for about seven hours on Tuesday.
Court documents show that the 22-year-old
has attempted suicide in the past. Court
documents also suggest that Duchene suffers
from emotional problems and that "couldn't
take it anymore."
Police believe Duchene was struggling
with the responsibilities of motherhood.
"She's not happy to care for her child,"
Sgt. Joel Tranter said...
To read more and to discuss this issue
on my blog, click
here.
Help
for Los
Angeles/Ventura
County Dads
Certified
Family Law
Specialist
Peter M.
Walzer was
one of the
key figures
in our successful
legislative
struggle
to preserve
the LaMusga
move-away
decision.
As Chair
of the State
Bar of California
Family Law
Section
Executive
Committee,
Walzer lobbied
the state
legislature
to improve
California
laws on
child support
and child
custody.
He's an
American
Academy
of Matrimonial
Lawyers
Fellow who
has authored
numerous
articles
on custody
issues,
business
valuation
in marital
dissolutions
and spousal
and child
support.
www.California-Divorce.com
|
The LaMusga
Company
The LaMusga
Company
provides
customized
solutions
to assist
individuals
and business
owners in
reaching
their financial
goals. The
LaMusga
Company
is committed
to helping
you accomplish
your long-term
financial
objectives.
LaMusgaCo.com
|
|
|
|
Is Feminist Blogger Jeff Fecke Banning Opposition
Views?
Background:
Last month feminist bloggers Amanda Marcotte
of Pandagon and Jeff Fecke of Shakespeare's
Sister
vehemently attacked me over comments
about the domestic violence issue I had
made in an interview. Now feminist blogger
Jeff Fecke and his compatriot Melissa McEwan
are on the attack again, with Jeff's new
piece
The Tune's the Same, Only the Words Have
Changed. My response was
Feminist Bloggers on the Warpath Against
Me Again, this Time over 'Power & Control
in the Domestic Violence Industry--a New
DV Wheel'.
Apparently either feminist blogger Jeff
Fecke and/or his compatriot Melissa McEwan
have banned Lee, a dissenter, from their
site. (The screen shot pictured is lousy
but it says at the top "Banned by the webmaster.
Your comments will not be added.")
It is common practice for feminist bloggers
to ban men's rights/fathers' rights blog
commenters, which reflects the weaknesses
in many of their arguments. By contrast,
feminist blog posters are given wide latitude
on my site.
To be fair, I do not know what Lee has
posted there in the past. If Jeff and Melissa
would like to let me know why Lee was banned,
I will post their views here on my blog.
Also, to be fair, I was surprised and pleased
to see that a detailed comment today from
Marc Angelucci on domestic violence was
not deleted, or not yet anyway.
The comment Lee attempted to post is
below...
To read more and to discuss this issue
on my blog, click
here.
Dr.
Warren Farrell's Shared
Parenting Evidence Kit--What
You Need to Win Shared Physical
Custody
Dr. Warren Farrell, a top
expert on children of divorce
now offers a complete evidence
kit to help you win shared
custody. The DVDs,
audio CD and electronic
files summarize the best
scientific research available
collected over decades.
Scientific research has
proven that children do
far better with near equal
time with both parents with
minimal conditions.
This video set was developed
to educate parents, judges,
lawyers, psychologists and
other divorce professionals.
Most judges are doing exactly
what is worst for children
with sole-custody.
Submitted as evidence this
will maximize your chances.
Divorce Reform groups call(508)
381-1450 to use as fundraiser.
www.BestInterestofChildren.org |
 |
Help for Michigan Dads
Michigan family law
attorney Mindy L. Hitchcock
has experience fighting
for noncustodial parents
against Michigan's abusive
FOC. Her
holistic approach to
divorce gets results for
her clients while avoiding
the scorched earth approach
to law that leaves families
emotionally and financially
devastated.
Lady4Justice.com
|
|
|
Tennessee Department of Health Says
'Approximately 98% of documented
domestic assaults are committed
by men against women'
Pajamas
Media advice columnist
Dr. Helen Smith (pictured) is
a forensic psychologist who often
has an interesting perspective on
gender issues. One of Helen's recent
blog posts concerns false information
about domestic violence being put
out by the Tennessee Department
of Health. Apparently the Department
is putting forth the you-must-be-kidding
claim that "Approximately 98% of
documented domestic assaults are
committed by men against women."
Helen's post is below.
My Efforts at Educating Officialdom
So I received this card in the
mail announcing the new domestic
violence reporting requirements
for the Tennessee Department of
Health. I decided to check out their
website and found it to be lacking
in the recent research on the role
women play in domestic violence.
I also noticed that the reporting
form had the word "female" listed
first under "patient" and under
perpetrator in the first column
listed:
o Husband
o Ex-husband
o Boyfriend
o Ex-boyfriend
So I sent them this letter...
To read more and to discuss this
issue on my blog, click
here.
The Shull Case (Part V)--They Can
Prosecute a Woman for Credit Card
Fraud, but They Can't Prosecute
Her for a False Accusation of Domestic
Violence
Background:
Conscientious Virginia judge James
Michael Shull, who smoked out a
woman who sought to extend a restraining
order based on false charges of
domestic violence, was just removed
from the bench by
this Virginia Supreme Court ruling.
To learn more about the case, see
my blog posts
In Defense of Judge James Michael
Shull (Part I),
Part II,
Part III, or
Part IV, or read my co-authored
newspaper column defending Shull
here.
In the Shull
case, Tammy G. had obtained a domestic
violence protection order against
her husband Keith G., claiming that
he had stabbed her. At the time
of the G. hearing, the couple's
two young children, then ages three
and five, were staying with their
paternal grandmother. Keith testified
that he hadn't harmed Tammy, and
that if she did have a wound, she
had cut herself. Keith also testified
that Tammy had committed a similar
act on March 22, 2006, harming herself
and then calling the police to report
that Keith had attacked her.
Shull examined
the wounds and found that they were
four nearly identical razor blade-like
slices in two sets of parallel lines
spaced evenly apart--hardly the
type of wounds one would receive
in domestic combat, and entirely
consistent with Keith's allegations
that Tammy had cut herself. Shull
also examined the Wise County Sheriff's
Incident Report about Tammy G.'s
March allegations. According to
the report, Tammy "gave a statement
that she had done this to herself
to get attention," and "admitted
that she had self-inflicted her
wounds."
Shull concluded
that Tammy G.'s claims were false,
and he ruled against her. Despite
the later controversy over the case,
no party in the dispute is even
claiming that Shull made the wrong
decision in finding that the wounds
in question were self-inflicted.
In this case, Tammy G. attempted
to inflict great harm on her husband
and their children by falsely accusing
her husband of stabbing her. Yet
while the judge who worked hard
to discover the truth has been relentlessly
persecuted, Tammy G. faces no consequences
for her false allegations.
The list above is a partial list
of the various crimes Tammy G. faces
charges for. I have one question--why
can we criminally charge her for
credit card fraud but we can't charge
her for attempting to defraud the
court? Why can we charge her with
identity theft, but we can't charge
her for attempting the theft of
a father's children?
To discuss this issue on my blog,
click
here.
|
|
Are You the Target of Parental Alienation?
Parental alienation cases are among
the most difficult and complicated
in family law.
J. Michael Bone, Ph.D., is an
expert on parental alienation. If
you're a target parent, he can help
you get back into your children's
lives. Bone has worked as a custody
evaluator and as a therapist and
knows how to help the court find
the truth. His services are available
throughout the U.S. Dr. Bone can
be reached by phone at (407) 645-0662
or by email by clicking
here.
www.jmbconsulting.org
|
Help for Colorado Dads
As someone who has personally
experienced the heartbreak
of divorce and family breakup,
Brett W. Martin, Esq.
works to advance the interests
and concerns of fathers
in domestic and family law
litigation. Personal attention
is given to clients to help
them through a very difficult
time in their lives.
www.brettwmartin.com
|
|
|
Feminist Bloggers on the Warpath Against Me Again,
this Time over 'Power & Control in the Domestic
Violence Industry--a New DV Wheel'
Background:
Last month feminist bloggers Amanda Marcotte of
Pandagon and Jeff Fecke of Shakespeare's Sister
vehemently attacked me over comments about the domestic
violence issue I had made in an interview. The interview
was by Pajamas Media advice columnist Dr. Helen
Smith and can be seen at
Fighting for Men's Rights (Pajamas
Media, 10/8/07), and if anybody can figure out what
I said that was so offensive you're a hell of a
lot smarter than I am. To learn more about that
debate, click
here.
Feminist blogger Jeff Fecke and his compatriot
Melissa McEwan are on the warpath against me again.
Jeff's new attack piece
The Tune's the Same, Only the Words Have Changed
criticizes my recent blog post
Power
& Control in the Domestic Violence Industry--a New
DV Wheel. In that post I wrote:
"Many readers are familiar with the Duluth Wheel,
a visual representation of the feminist view that
domestic violence is perpetrated almost exclusively
by men and is a function of the patriarchy and men's
alleged patriarchal privileges. For three decades,
research has shown that this model is faulty, that
women are at least as likely to attack their male
partners as vice versa, and that a significant percentage
of injuries in heterosexual domestic violence are
sustained by men. Research shows that women use
weapons and the element of surprise to help balance
the domestic scales...
"Recently an authority in the domestic violence
field sent me and others this new Domestic Violence
Wheel which 'visually represents some of the obstacles
that reform-minded individuals such as yourselves
have had to encounter over the years.'"
Jeff writes:
"Ah, Glenn Sacks. For a guy who says he thinks
women should be free and equal, he sure spends a
lot of time finding reasons that we should repeal
all the domestic violence laws. Take his latest
creation, the Domestic Violence Wheel, which documents
the massive amount of power women have gained by
having legal recourse to get out of bad situations.
"While reading through this little wheel of inanity,
it occurred to me that I'd seen this sort of rhetoric
before. The complaints about the mainstream ignoring
them, anger that ideas had been hijacked. It was
all so familiar. And then it hit me: I've seen the
same words coming out of the mouths of the global
warming deniers and the evolution deniers!
"I don't know what it is about denialists that
leads them down the same path, but boy, they sure
seem to find it...apart from their rhetoric, these
three breeds of denialists all share another thing
in common: they're all absolutely, 100% wrong."
A few points:
1) I realize that Fecke compares me to "global
warming deniers and the evolution deniers" as a
way of discrediting me, but the analogy seems rather
attenuated. Worse, he doesn't factually contest
what is asserted in the DV Wheel, but instead merely
tells us it must be wrong because it's somehow like
those who deny global warming and evolution. It's
not much of an argument.
Some feminists have a bad habit of doing this--if
you're against something a feminist group wants,
it's like you're against women voting. If you say
something positive about fathers' previous role
in society, they say, "People used to think slavery
was good."
(As an aside, I believe in evolution, and I think
the preponderance of the evidence shows that global
warming is real, too. However, I know nothing of
science, so I rarely comment on such matters.)
2) Everybody makes mistakes, but Fecke's sloppiness
seems to be more than an occasional thing. He calls
the wheel "[Sacks'] latest creation," even though
it's right there in my original post that the wheel
was designed by "an authority in the domestic violence
field." This authority currently prefers to remain
anonymous, though that may change. I'd happily claim
credit for the Wheel, but it isn't mine.
3) Fecke implies that when I and those who agree
with me describe the domestic violence establishment
as an "industry," we are considering it a "conspiracy."
I don't believe the DV establishment is a conspiracy,
but I do believe that it's an industry. This doesn't
mean that I think the average DV shelter worker
is getting rich any more than I think the average
oil field roustabout is getting rich. But the domestic
violence establishment (and, even more so, the child
support enforcement establishment), often do
behave like industries or government bureaucracies.
They work to protect and expand their funding, they
exaggerate and distort problems in order to justify
keeping or increasing their funding, they lobby
(officially or unofficially), and they work the
media.
The DV industry, like most industries, certainly
does some good but, like most industries, also does
some harm. Society rightfully despises the wifebeater,
but the specter of the wifebeater has been used
to justify many destructive policies and civil liberties
violations. I don't want to get rid of the domestic
violence establishment--I want to reform it.
There's a good quote, by Lenin of all people,
that the proper way to win a political debate is
to counter your opponents' best arguments, not their
worst. If Fecke and his friends are interested in
countering myself and others who advocate reform
in the domestic violence establishment, they'd do
better to deal with our actual arguments, rather
than painting spurious analogies between us and
groups they consider extremist.
Fecke's full post can be seen
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|
My Family Has Two Houses...and
I'm Okay
A workshop for children
of separation or divorce
in a workbook! In the privacy
of your own home, you can
provide your child with
a safe way of looking at
their thoughts and feelings
and help to open
discussion of relevant issues
for them with you. This
workbook can make the difference
between your child surviving
your divorce and thriving
despite it! To learn more
about My family has
two houses ...and I'm Okay!
and to order, click
here. |
|
How to Win Shared Custody
Here are the litigation
secrets to winning shared
physical & legal custody
from Boston trial lawyer
Nick Palermo, Esquire
who has won
these cases for 24 years.
It costs $5,000 or more
in legal fees to gain the
knowledge and guidance contained
in this $10 handbook--The
Ten Essential Elements to
Winning Joint Shared Physical
and Legal Custody.
www.TenEssentialElements.com
|
|
|
Touching Story of Father-Daughter Bond on CBS Crime
Show NCIS
I'm
usually not one for crime shows, but I saw a touching
episode of NCIS while on an airplane recently. It's
about a father's love for his daughter, and I'm
a sentimental sucker on the subject, so be forewarned
before you proceed.
NCIS (Naval Criminal Investigative Service) is
an action drama starring Mark Harmon as NCIS Special
Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs, a former Marine who is
now a skilled investigator. Gibbs' daughter Kelly
died 15 years ago, when she was 7. In the recent
episode "Requiem," Kelly's best childhood friend
Maddie is in trouble and later kidnapped, and Gibbs
saves her.
When Kelly was little she and Gibbs made a time
capsule (pictured) out of one of her lunchboxes
and buried it in the front yard. When Maddie first
contacts Gibbs, he digs up the time capsule from
his front yard but can't bring himself to open it.
At the end of the show, he takes out a picture
of the two girls with their arms around each other
as children and a picture of him with his arm around
Maddie as an adult, puts them together, and starts
to open the time capsule. To watch this final scene,
click
here.
When it comes to the time capsule, open the letter
little Kelly wrote to her dad when he was deployed
to Kuwait in 1990, and also click on the dog tags.
It's nice to see an accurate TV portrayal
of father-daughter relationship.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|