|
Erectile
Dysfunction? Hair Loss? The Men's Renaissance
Health Centers Can Help
The Men's Renaissance Health Centers are
a specialty medical facility dedicated to
the treatment of Men's Sexual Health, Hair
Transplantation, and Cosmetic Dermatology.
MRHC features the latest "Star Lux" Laser
technology for Facial Rejuvenation and Hair
Removal. Call (866) 398-6086 for
more info., and mention Glenn Sacks to receive
special rates.
Erectile
Dysfunction? Confidential Consultations,
Noninvasive Solutions
Men's Renaissance Heath Center specializes
in confidential consultations on Erectile
Dysfunction, Premature Ejaculation and Sexual
Potency. Unlike other clinics that focus
the patient on one invasive procedure featuring
constant injections, MRHC starts with a
thorough exam by a medical doctor and seeks
to find the most appropriate and least invasive
solution to the problem. Offering FDA approved
medications and devices, the MRHC makes
the process of recovering youthful performance
levels comfortable and rapid. Call (866)
398-6086 for more info., and mention
Glenn Sacks to receive special rates.
Hair Loss? Follicular Unit Transplantation
is the New Gold Standard
Follicular Unit Transplantation is the
newest technique of permanent surgical hair
restoration. With FUT, hair is transplanted
from the permanent zone in the back of the
scalp into balding areas, using only one's
own naturally occurring, individual follicular
units. This unique procedure provides what
we all want: hair that looks natural throughout,
no matter what we do or which way the wind
blows. Most importantly, transplanted hair
will continue to grow for the rest of the
patient's life. Call (866) 398-6086
for more info., and mention Glenn Sacks
to receive special rates.
|
Fathers' Advocate Dave Bruer Killed in Accident
I recently learned that Dave Bruer of the
Fathers
Resource Center was killed in a motorcycle accident.
Dave was a committed advocate who helped many, many
fathers with their custody and family law problems.
The newspaper article about this tragedy is below.
Motorcyclist killed in crash ID'd as advocate for
fathers
North County Times, 9/24/07
VISTA -- A man killed Sunday morning in a motorcycle
crash on Highway 78 was identified by the county
medical examiner's office today as the founder of
the Fathers Resource Center, an Encinitas-based
parenting organization.
David Cavan Bruer, 55, of Encinitas, was pronounced
dead at the scene near Emerald Drive, an investigator
for the office said.
Authorities said Bruer had been speeding when
he tried to pass through a narrow gap in traffic
and was clipped by a truck. He is survived by his
son, John-David Bruer, the medical examiner's office
reported.
Bruer began working as an advocate for fathers
nearly 20 years ago. He brought the Fathers Resource
Center -- which formed to help fathers with issues
such as paternity to domestic abuse, to custody
and visitation -- to Encinitas in 1997.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
The Marriage Movement Is 'Very Dismissive of Non-Custodial
Fathers'
I'm
quoted on the marriage movement and federal marriage
programs in Mary Meehan's recent article
Marriage as social medicine (Lexington Herald-Leader,
9/25/07). According to the article:
"[Sacks] said the pro-marriage movement has become
'kind of a mania' and is 'very dismissive of non-custodial
fathers.' It makes the assumption, he said, 'that
no man will take responsibility unless the government
coerces them to do it' and puts responsible fathers
on the defensive."
One of my criticisms of the marriage movement
and its influential thinkers--including David Blankenhorn,
author of
Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent
Social Problem, and Elizabeth Marquardt
(pictured), author of
Between Two Worlds--is its view of divorced
fathers.
In
Fatherless America, Blankenhorn has many
good things to say on the importance of fathers
and of intact families. In one email exchange with
David, I told him that I had been reading his book
on a Sunday when my wife and kids had gone to see
a movie, and that while reading it I kept looking
out the window to see if they had come back yet--the
book really made me want to be with my kids.
Yet Blankenhorn errs by placing almost all blame
for family breakdown on fathers, who allegedly "abandon"
their children. A couple years ago there was a little
three-sided debate over this assertion between Blankenhorn,
Stephen Baskerville and I at the Family Scholars
blog
here.
Marquardt does make a substantive effort to be
gender-balanced in
Between Two Worlds, and she makes a good
case that what children need are married parents,
though she overstates it a bit. Yet Marquardt is
very opposed to shared parenting and has a low regard
for the contributions of noncustodial parents after
a divorce. To her credit, she acknowledged this
issue at the Children's Rights Council conference
last year, explaining that her previous analysis
seemed to end at family breakdown, providing no
answers for the millions of families which have
already broken down.
The Herald-Leader article mostly deals
with federal marriage programs. One is the "Bluegrass
Healthy Marriage Initiative, one of the federally
funded programs, [which operates] under a three-year,
$1 million grant with the goal of promoting marriage
and increasing the amount of money unwed fathers
pay in child support."
I'm all for promoting marriage, but some of these
federal programs seem to be more oriented towards
fathers-as-wallets than serious attempts to create
stable families.
We did a
His Side with Glenn Sacks show on this
a few years ago called "Bush's Marriage Initiative:
A Step Forward for Families or a State Intrusion?"
The show featured a debate between Stephen Baskerville,
a critic of the Initiative, and Rozario Slack of
First Things First, one of the most prominent advocates
of the proposals. To learn more and to listen to
the show, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Appeals Court Blocks Visit Between Husband-Killer
Mary Winkler and Her Children
Background:
Mary Winkler--who shot her husband in the back and
then refused to aid him or call 911 as he slowly
bled to death for 20 minutes--walked away a free
woman last month after serving a farcically brief
"sentence" for her crimes. She is currently in a
custody battle with Matthew Winkler's parents, who
have been raising their three daughters for the
last 18 months.
The Winklers seek to terminate Mary Winkler's
parental rights and adopt the girls. I support their
position. Last week, Mary Winkler was granted supervised
visits with her daughters--an important step towards
getting custody of them.
To learn more about this horrendous injustice,
see my co-authored column
No child custody for husband-killer Mary Winkler
(World Net Daily,
9/14/07), or click
here.
A Tennessee appeals court Friday blocked a supervised
visit between Mary Winkler and her children, in
response to an appeals by Dan and Diane Winkler,
the children's grandparents. The Associated
Press story is below.
Mary Winkler Visit With Children Blocked
Associated Press, 9/30/07
JACKSON, Tenn. (AP) -- An appeals court Friday
blocked a supervised visit between a woman convicted
of killing her minister-husband and their children.
The court issued a stay against the Saturday
visit after a last-minute application from the children's
paternal grandparents, who have had temporary custody
of the three young girls since Mary Winkler went
to jail after the March 2006 shotgun shooting.
Winkler, 33, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter
in April for shooting Church of Christ minister
Matthew Winkler at their residence in Selmer.
"It's very devastating to Mary and I'm sure to
the children," said Winkler's attorney, Kay Farese
Turner.
The stay is only temporary pending an investigation
of Dan and Diane Winkler's accusations that the
judge who originally granted the visit ruled erroneously,
Turner said.
A call to the office of William R. Neese, Dan
and Diane Winkler's custody attorney, late Friday
was not immediately returned.
Winkler has said the grandparents will not let
her see or talk to her children, who are now 10,
8 and 2 years old. They are seeking to terminate
her parental rights and adopt the children while
Winkler is attempting to regain custody.
Her former parents-in-law also have filed a $2
million wrongful death lawsuit against her.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Fathers & Families: Advocacy for the Child-Father
Bond
Fathers & Families is a non-profit organization
advocating for the right of every child
to have two parents. Called by some a "fathers'
rights organization," Fathers & Families
is made up of men and women who believe
that fathers are an essential part of a
child's life and that divorce or separation
should not change this.
www.FathersandFamilies.org
|
'Even in divorces where a mother has been the family
breadwinner and the father has stayed home, a lot
of women insist on fighting for sole custody'
I
first noticed the article
The Daddy Track (Boston Globe, 7/8/07)
because there's a nice quote in it from Dan Hogan
of
Fathers & Families about the anti-father gender
bias of our family courts. However, there are several
other items of interest in it:
1) "Donna Booth, a Saugus divorce lawyer, says
that...Even in divorces where a mother has been
the family breadwinner and the father has stayed
home, a lot of women who come into her office, Booth
says, insist on fighting for sole custody."
And most of the time they get it. The feminists
have abdicated all responsibility on this issue--for
decades they've harangued men to put aside their
careers so they can spend more time on child care
and to support their wives' careers. Yet when a
father who did exactly as the feminists wanted loses
custody of his children, you'll not hear a peep
from the National Organization for Women. In fact,
they'll often support the mother.
2) "'Society is really changing,' says Rosanna
Hertz, a Wellesley College professor of sociology
and women's studies. 'What we're seeing is more
and more men stepping up to the plate.' At the same
time, those dads are discovering what single mothers
have long known: Along with offering rewards, the
job requires sacrifices."
I've criticized Hertz's work on numerous occasions--see
my co-authored column
Are Single Mothers the 'New American Family?'
(World Net Daily, 9/28/06)--and I won't
repeat the argument here. In the above quote, Hertz
is trying to be nice, I suppose, and I guess I should
appreciate that. However, I disagree with her premise--common
among feminists--that the only parenting that counts
is child care. Whatever it is that privileged men
go off and do 60 hours a week that seems vaguely
connected to the house, cars, necessities and luxuries
the wife and children enjoy doesn't count. For thousands
of years, Ms. Hertz, men have "stepped up to the
plate" by working hard at dangerous, demanding jobs
in order to support their families. (To hear me
gripe about this more, see my column
Hate My Father? No Ma'am!, World Net Daily,
4/8/02).
3) "When he divorced, [Jay] Portnow enjoyed something
of a national reputation for his work in rehabilitative
medicine and was routinely invited on the paid lecture
circuit. After one son came to live with him full
time and he gained half-time custody of the other,
he started turning down out-of-town engagements
because being home 'was the more important job to
do.' Portnow says he is obligated to continue child
support to his former wife for another four years.
In addition, he is paying almost $100,000 a year
for his sons to attend New York University and Yeshiva
University in Manhattan.
"I consider it ransom," he says. "Twelve years
ago, it was much harder for men who wanted to be
a part of their children's lives." Indeed, Portnow
says, to make it happen back then, he bought a house
not far from the marital home, where his former
wife still lives. His sons see and always have seen
their mother. Of his relationship with his ex-spouse,
however, he says, "I send the checks, and if I'm
late, she calls. That's it."
This is very common. In my co-authored column
Not the Era of the Deadbeat Dad but the Era of the
Hero Father (Ft. Worth Star-Telegram,
6/19/05), I wrote:
"While divorced dads are unfairly stigmatized
as stingy, some noncustodial fathers raise their
children in their homes but still pay child support
to the children's mothers. Many others never ask
for child support. In the face of a family court
system which usually grants mothers a monopoly of
power over children, these fathers must buy or rent
their children back. When mothers allow their children
to live with their fathers--or send them there because
they've become unruly or inconvenient--fathers often
won't challenge custodial and financial arrangements
because they fear doing so will mean they'll be
pushed out of their children's lives."
4) I've often pointed out that while fathers
are often slammed as "deadbeat dads," men actually
have a far better record of paying child support
than women do. When women do pay it, it's usually
minimal. According to the article:
"With his children's mother living in Canada,
[Keith] Mochida, too, is left mostly to do everything--shopping,
cooking, cleaning, chauffeuring, chaperoning--'and
that doesn't include the surprises.' His former
wife, who has remarried and has a new son, pays
him $300 a month in child support. She comes down
every three months or so and takes their son and
daughter to a hotel for a few days to visit, and
the children go to Canada for a good part of the
summer."
And I bet she complains about her bum ex-husband
sucking $300 a month out of her...
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Parenting
Plan Calendar Software
Shared Ground (R) is
an easy-to-use software
program designed for divorced
parents to track their parenting
plan schedules over many
years. Do-it-yourself or
let us build your approved
parenting plan into a multi-year
calendar so that you can
print, share, or modify
the calendar later. Parents,
attorneys, arbitrators and
mediators can generate equitable
parenting plans, which is
especially useful for parents
seeking fair division of
their children's time. FREE
ASSISTANCE TO OUR CLIENTS-
$49.95 one-time charge,
FREE TRIAL & MONEY-BACK
GUARANTEE. Click
here for more information. |
Jeff Leving's New Book--Divorce
Wars
Jeffery M. Leving, one of America's
most prominent divorce lawyers,
has written a new book on how to
win any divorce fairly, even when
your spouse brings out the heavy
artillery.
Divorce Wars: A Field Guide to the
Winning Tactics, Preemptive Strikes,
and Top Maneuvers When Divorce Gets
Ugly provides essential advice
on everything from picking the right
lawyer and devising a winning settlement
strategy to getting the most from
your day in court and dealing with
an ex-spouse.
Divorce Wars is available
here.
Help, Resources for Dads
The
National Fathers' Resource Center
is a division of
Fathers For Equal Rights, Inc.
(FER), located in Dallas, Texas,
with offices in both Dallas and
Houston. In existence for over three
decades, it has services and resources
for dads nationwide and is one of
the largest and most active fathers'
rights organizations in the U.S.
www.fathers4kids.org
|
|
'If I do really well in school, maybe my daddy will
come back'A reader recently reminded
me of a story I told on
His Side with Glenn
Sacks a couple years ago, one of the saddest
I've ever heard:
"The secretary at another radio station where
I used to do the show told me a story about her
son. The father and the mother broke up when the
boy was about four or five, and the father soon
disappeared from the boy's life.
"When the boy started school, he always worked
very hard and did all his homework and got good
grades, even though his mother never pushed him
to do well in school or to do his homework. She
didn't have to push him--he always did it on his
own.
"One day when the boy was about nine the mother
got curious about this. After all, most boys don't
take to school so well, and aren't as conscientious
about their studies. I know--I've lived it with
my son for many, many years.
"So at one point the mom asked the boy, 'Why
do you work so hard at school and do so well?'
"The boy looked at her and replied, 'Well, I
think if I do really well in school, maybe my daddy
will come back.'"
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Hero Father Takes Case to Kentucky Supreme Court
The Kentucky Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments
in a case involving hero father Ren Hinshaw, a "duped
dad" fighting to retain custody of the 8-year-old
boy he's raised since birth. Hinshaw didn't find
out that he wasn't the boy's biological father until
his divorce, when his ex-wife went to court to cut
him out of the boy's life, claiming Hinshaw had
no legal right to keep seeing what he thought was
his kid. According to a Louisville Courier-Journal
article earlier this year:
"'He is my son, and I am his dad,' Hinshaw said
in an e-mail to the newspaper.
"The child's mother says Hinshaw should have
no right to custody...
"Hinshaw was in the delivery room when the boy
he thought was his son was born in 1999.
"He cut the umbilical cord and later changed
the boy's diapers, taught him to talk and volunteered
at his school, according to court records.
"Hinshaw, a technology consultant at the University
of Louisville's Kornhauser Health Sciences Library,
described the boy in court records as the most important
thing in his life.
"But when the child's mother, Jacqueline, divorced
Hinshaw in 2003, she disclosed he wasn't the biological
father and asked Jefferson Family Court to deny
him custody.
"Judge Virginia Whittinghill ordered a counselor
to meet with the child. She concluded he had bonded
with Hinshaw and that it would be 'very devastating
to him if he was not in his life.' She described
Hinshaw as the boy's 'psychological father.'
"Whittinghill not only granted Hinshaw's motion
for joint custody, she also made his home the boy's
primary residence and ordered his ex-wife to pay
him $25,000 in attorney's fees.
"The Court of Appeals last September affirmed
the decision, saying the case wasn't about paternity
but 'the custody rights between a husband and wife
as they relate to a child born and raised within
the confines of the marriage.'
"Hinshaw's ex-wife, who has since remarried,
is now asking the state Supreme Court to hear the
case. She and her lawyer, Peter Ostermiller, declined
comment, but in court papers they say that DNA should
rule, even if the decision is not in the child's
best interests.
"They also contend that Hinshaw had no standing
to seek custody, just as the state Supreme Court
held last year when it denied such rights to a lesbian
partner who was not a child's legal parent.
"After two years as the boy's primary parent,
Hinshaw said in court papers that his bond with
the child has grown even stronger and that it would
'take a chunk' out of his heart if the child was
taken away.
"'This is a bond that no person should put asunder,'
he said."
The case is now being considered by the Kentucky
Supreme Court, along with the James Rhoades case.
To learn more, click
here.
We rarely hear publicly about cases like Hinshaw's,
but I see them often...
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
|

|
Families Against Confiscatory Child
Support (FACCS)
FACCS is the national voice for
fair and reasonable child support.
FACCS believes all parents have
an obligation to support their children
financially. However, in high
income cases, state and federal
laws often result in excessive awards
that are effectively alimony in
disguise and have little to do with
supporting children. Huge child
support awards lead to protracted
custody disputes, undermines co-parenting,
and leaves children worse off financially.
www.faccsonline.org /
contact@faccsonline.org
|
|
His Side with Glenn Sacks Radio Commentary:
The Brenda Nesselroad-Slaby Case
 My
recent His
Side with Glenn Sacks radio commentary
for KLAA AM 830 in Los Angeles discusses gender
bias and the female sentencing discount in the Brenda
Nesselroad-Slaby case. To listen to the commentary,
click
here.
To learn more about the case, see my blog post
Outrage--Woman
Leaves Her Toddler in Car for 8 Hours on Hot Day
While at Work, Child Dies, She's Not Charged.
His Side with Glenn Sacks radio commentaries
are broadcast daily on KLAA AM 830, a 50,000 watt
talk station in Los Angeles and Orange County. KLAA
AM 830 is owned by Arte Moreno, owner of the Los
Angeles Angels of Anaheim. KLAA hosts include Glenn
Beck and Michael Savage.
From 2003-2005,
His Side with
Glenn Sacks ran in a syndicated talk show
format in Los Angeles, New York City, Boston, Seattle,
and other cities. To listen to show archives, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
Online Dating Rights
Online Dating Rights
opposes the new federal
International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act, which requires
Americans who seek to meet
foreigners via the internet
to have a criminal background
check and an intrusive report
about intimate details of
one's life BEFORE any communication--the
first time in US history
that such checks have been
required.
www.onlinedatingrights.com
|
|
|
Fathers & Families News Digest, 10/1/07
Below
are some recent articles and items of interest from
Fathers & Families' latest News Digest.
Ex-tended clans: Divorce often leaves some family
ties intact (USA Today, 10/1/07)
DHS program helps noncustodial parents (Tulsa
World, 10/1/07)
Helping hand for single dads (Rocky Mountain
News, 10/1/07)
Child Support Payments More Accessible (North
County Gazette, 10/1/07)
Divorced from Reality (New York Times,
9/29/07)
Duke Apologizes to Lacrosse Players (Associated
Press, 9/29/07)
Proposal on domestic violence policy angers FOP
(Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/26/07)
San Mateo Co.: Governor Signs Child Support Bill
into Law (CBS5.com, 9/26/07)
Judge grants father custody in state's longest divorce
case (Boston Globe, 9/25/07)
Centers For Disease Control Finds Women Commit Half
Of Domestic Violence, Reports National Coalition
of Free Men (EWorldWire, 9/24/07)
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Toyota Makes an Ad About My Teenage Son--and Yours,
Too
In
my recent blog post
I've
Never Seen My Son Move So Fast..., I explained
how quickly my teenage son moves to get away from
me whenever there are teenage girls around.
Afterwards, a reader pointed out a Toyota car
commercial which captures the teenage "I'm ashamed
of my parents" sentiment perfectly.
As for father-son ads, I also recommend Ford's
new father-positive car commercial
"We
Know."
To watch, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|
Alicia M. Crowe's Real Dads Stand
Up!
Alicia M. Crowe's new book Real
Dads Stand Up! explains what
every single father should know
about child support, rights and
custody. Learn how to exercise your
legal rights, avoid 'baby mama drama',
navigate the child support system,
gain and maintain access to your
children, and settle issues without
going to trial.
www.realdadsstandup.com |
Fathers'
Rights Legal Help
If you need help with divorce, child custody,
child support, alimony and visitation issues,
The Law
Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. is
one of the only law firms in the country
focused almost exclusively on fathers' rights
in divorce. Leving did heroic work on the
Elian Gonzalez case, helping reunite Elian
with his father. He also co-authored Illinois'
Joint Custody Law, and was named one of
"America's Best Lawyers" by Forbes Radio.
Leving is the author of
Fathers' Rights: Hard Hitting and Fair Advice
for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute.
Call today for an initial consultation (312)
807-3990 or visit us on the web at
www.dadsrights.com.
|
Good Dad or Insensitive Dad? (Part I)

The strict father has been the target
of much criticism over the past four decades,
which is one reason why we don't have very
many strict fathers around any more. (Divorce
is another reason). I'm not a particular
advocate of strict/hard-line parenting,
and it's certainly true that the old, tough
dad had his drawbacks. The best parent is
one who mixes affection and discipline,
who loves and is lovable but at the same
time is respected and, when necessary, feared.
But not all parents can do all these things,
and while we might have wished that the
old dad were more sensitive, he was very
important, and his virtues much underappreciated.
Lately I've thought of some of my friends'
fathers and the way they interacted with
their sons. One of my friends in college
was a man of Japanese ancestry whom we'll
call Tim. Tim and his father often had conflicts--his
father was hard-line, traditionally masculine,
and conservative, whereas Tim was sensitive,
unsure of himself, and liberal.
Tim and I were both from Los Angeles
and were both away at college in Northern
California. I recall one time in Tim's sophomore
year he was troubled by college and where
he was heading in life, and called his father,
telling him he wanted to quit school. What
his father told him made quite an impression
on me at the time. He said:
"You're 21, right? Well, when I was 21
things were a bit different for me.
"When I was 21, I had a wife and a kid
to support, no job, no education, no money,
no property, and I'd just spent three years
in a concentration camp. You stay there
and tough it out."
Was he right or was he wrong? On one
level, he was certainly correct to put his
son's problems in perspective, and his son
did go on to finish school and have a successful
career. On the other hand, perhaps a more
understanding approach would have been better--in
part because of his father's hard-line attitude,
he and his son remained in conflict to one
degree or another for many years. Perhaps
his experiences in Manzanar (pictured above)
warped his perception of what a young person's
life should be like.
On balance, I would side with the father--sometimes
kids need someone to stiffen their backs
and push them forward.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
Help for
Los Angeles/Ventura
County Dads
Certified
Family Law
Specialist
Peter M.
Walzer was
one of the
key figures
in our successful
legislative
struggle
to preserve
the LaMusga
move-away
decision.
As Chair
of the State
Bar of California
Family Law
Section
Executive
Committee,
Walzer lobbied
the state
legislature
to improve
California
laws on
child support
and child
custody.
He's an
American
Academy
of Matrimonial
Lawyers
Fellow who
has authored
numerous
articles
on custody
issues,
business
valuation
in marital
dissolutions
and spousal
and child
support.
www.California-Divorce.com
|
|
|
|
The LaMusga Company
The LaMusga Company provides
customized solutions to
assist individuals and business
owners in reaching their
financial goals. The LaMusga
Company is committed to
helping you accomplish your
long-term financial objectives.
LaMusgaCo.com |
|
A Visit from the Ex

"Oh, and your ex stopped
by..."
From Tom Cheney, in the New Yorker.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Dr.
Warren Farrell's
Shared Parenting
Evidence
Kit--What
You Need
to Win Shared
Physical
Custody
Dr. Warren
Farrell,
a top expert
on children
of divorce
now offers
a complete
evidence
kit to help
you win
shared custody.
The DVDs,
audio CD
and electronic
files summarize
the best
scientific
research
available
collected
over decades.
Scientific
research
has proven
that children
do far better
with near
equal time
with both
parents
with minimal
conditions.
This video
set was
developed
to educate
parents,
judges,
lawyers,
psychologists
and other
divorce
professionals.
Most judges
are doing
exactly
what is
worst for
children
with sole-custody.
Submitted
as evidence
this will
maximize
your chances.
Divorce
Reform groups
call(508)
381-1450
to use as
fundraiser.
www.BestInterestofChildren.org
|
|
|
 |
Help for Michigan Dads
Michigan family law
attorney Mindy L. Hitchcock
has experience fighting
for noncustodial parents
against Michigan's abusive
FOC. Her
holistic approach to
divorce gets results for
her clients while avoiding
the scorched earth approach
to law that leaves families
emotionally and financially
devastated.
Lady4Justice.com
|
|
|
Are the Streets Really More Dangerous
Today, or Are We Just More Careful?
I went to the wedding of a childhood
friend the other day, and in reminiscing
about the old days, it struck us
how different things were back then.
For example:
1) When I was six or seven years
old, I would walk to school every
day with Alice, a neighbor girl
who was only a year older than me.
The school wasn't that far away,
but it was at least a half a mile,
across a major street. Perhaps things
are different in rural areas, but
I can't imagine letting my daughter
walk to school with only another
kid her age, even now, and she's
nine, not seven.
2) We used to play sports in
the street for hours after school.
At the wedding, my childhood friend
Joe said, "We played until the street
lights came on--that's when you
knew it was time to go home and
have dinner." How often does this
happened anymore? I wouldn't let
my kid, at age 6 or 7, go out of
sight to play ball on some other
kid's street for several hours.
Even my soon-to-be 15-year-old son
is on a constant cell phone leash.
(One other reason why this couldn't
happen today is that the schools
pile so much goddamn homework on
the kids that there's no time to
spend hours running around and playing
after school. Instead, it's come
home, have a snack and then sit
down to do homework. And if I sound
bitter, that's because I am...)
So what is it--are things really
more dangerous today, or are we
just more careful? I suspect it's
the latter, but maybe I'm wrong.
To discuss this issue on my blog,
click
here.
Carey Roberts--The International
Marriage Broker Regulation Act of
2005 Is a 'Feminist Hoax'
Background:
Some, including former Fox News
columnist Wendy McElroy, have criticized
the International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act of 2005 (IMBRA) for
being anti-male.
According to McElroy, "The
IMBRA requires American men who
wish to correspond with foreign
women through private for-profit
matchmaking agencies to first provide
those businesses with their police
records and other personal information
to be turned over to the women.
Corresponding with a foreigner is
legal. Marrying a foreigner is legal....Now
American men who wish to pursue
a legal activity must release their
government files to a foreign business
and foreign individuals."
A group has formed to protest
the anti-male IMBRA--Online
Dating Rights (ODR). The ODR
criticizes the IMBRA, and notes
"this is the first time in US history
criminal background checks have
been required for two people to
communicate." To learn more,
click
here.
Men's rights columnist
Carey Roberts has an interesting
new column on the IMBRA--IMBRA:
Anatomy of a Feminist Hoax (MensNewsDaily.com,
9/26/07). Roberts writes:
"[IMBRA opponent] Senator Maria
Cantwell of Washington...brandished
the notion of "mail-order brides,"
casting foreign women as victims
of predatory males. Then she dubbed
international dating services as
"marriage brokers," conjuring up
the image of a rogue operation trading
lives for dollars.
"On July 13, 2004, the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee scheduled
a hearing to air the issue. No dating
services or happily-betrothed foreign
women were invited to testify --
their comments would not likely
fit the script.
"During her testimony, Cantwell
made the startling claim that match-making
services serve as a nefarious front
for international human trafficking.
She concluded, "there is a growing
epidemic of domestic abuse among
couples who meet via international
marriage brokers." As proof of that
"epidemic," she highlighted the
cases of three abused women.
"Cantwell's depiction of comely
maidens being seduced into prostitution
rings was more than Sen. Sam Brownback
could resist, and before long he
signed on as a leading co-sponsor
of the International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act. With liberals and
conservatives now on board, IMBRA's
political star was rising.
"But it turns out that Senator
Cantwell's supposition that dating
services drag women into a life
of sex slavery and indentured servitude
was nothing more than a feminist
tall-tale.
"There was the U.S. Immigration
and Naturalization Service report
that revealed, "less than 1 percent
of the abuse cases now being brought
to the attention of the INS can
be attributed to the mail-order
bride industry."
"A second analysis soberly concluded
that foreign brides are "dramatically
less likely to be involved in domestic
violence as calculated by the Intimate
Partner Murder Rate."
"And earlier this week the Washington
Post reported that early estimates
of up to 100,000 human trafficking
victims being secreted into the
United States each year were grossly
exaggerated. Despite more than $150
million of taxpayer dollars diverted
to a massive search and rescue effort,
it turns out the actual number of
trafficking victims is closer to
200 annually."
Read Roberts' full column
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog,
click
here.
|
|
Are You the Target of Parental Alienation?
Parental alienation cases are among
the most difficult and complicated
in family law.
J. Michael Bone, Ph.D., is an
expert on parental alienation. If
you're a target parent, he can help
you get back into your children's
lives. Bone has worked as a custody
evaluator and as a therapist and
knows how to help the court find
the truth. His services are available
throughout the U.S. Dr. Bone can
be reached by phone at (407) 645-0662
or by email by clicking
here.
www.jmbconsulting.org
|
Help for Colorado Dads
As someone who has personally
experienced the heartbreak
of divorce and family breakup,
Brett W. Martin, Esq.
works to advance the interests
and concerns of fathers
in domestic and family law
litigation. Personal attention
is given to clients to help
them through a very difficult
time in their lives.
www.brettwmartin.com
|
|
|
From 'Adult Children of Parental Alienation Syndrome':
'The primary alienation strategy was over-reacting
to minor incidents that occurred at dad's house'
Amy
J.L. Baker's
book
Adult Children of Parental Alienation Syndrome:
Breaking the Ties that Bind details the
stories of adult children of divorce--voices we
need to hear much more often. One of the cases she
details is that of David, whose parents divorced
when he was six.
David's father worked long hours but he had positive,
loving feelings towards him. He and his two siblings
visited their father regularly and enjoyed and valued
the experience.
However, as so often happens, after David's father
remarried, his mother's attitude changed, and she
began interfering with the visits. According to
Baker, "The primary alienation strategy used by
his mother was over-reacting to minor incidents
that occurred at David's father's house, building
a case for the fact that his father was careless
and/or dangerous."
David explains:
"Something would happen at Dad's house like even
the littlest thing like I remember one time we were
at Grandma's house and my sister had some jacks
and we were playing jacks and we went off to do
something else and we came back into the room and
we were kind of running around and she fell on one
of the jacks and one of them kind of hit her thigh
and went in a little bit. I remember it wasn't that
big a deal but when we got home you would have thought
someone had beat her. I was seven or eight at the
time and my sister was five. I remember thinking
at some point after this happened several times
that...on my way home and it was about a 30-40 minute
drive I remember just dreading it and thinking what
will it be...what is going to be the thing that
upsets her this time."
Baker says:
"David's mother had a way of finding out about
what happened during visitation and then zeroing
in on the most negative aspect of the visit to the
exclusion of everything else. She would inquire
about the visit until she heard something negative."
Another of the mother's alienation tactics was
to invoke a rule that if any of the three children
did not want to visit, then none could. When David's
younger sister "decided" that she didn't want to
visit her dad's house, this gave mom the pretext
she needed to cut off all visitation.
A third tactic was to try to paint the father
as stingy or financially selfish...
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
|
My Family Has Two Houses...and
I'm Okay
A workshop for children
of separation or divorce
in a workbook! In the privacy
of your own home, you can
provide your child with
a safe way of looking at
their thoughts and feelings
and help to open
discussion of relevant issues
for them with you. This
workbook can make the difference
between your child surviving
your divorce and thriving
despite it! To learn more
about My family has
two houses ...and I'm Okay!
and to order, click
here. |
How to Win Shared Custody
Here are the litigation secrets
to winning shared physical & legal
custody from Boston trial lawyer
Nick Palermo, Esquire
who has won these cases
for 24 years. It costs $5,000.
or more in legal fees to gain the
knowledge and guidance contained
in this $10 handbook--The Ten
Essential Elements to Winning Joint
Shared Physical and Legal Custody.
www.TenEssentialElements.com
|
|
'Send more money right away / is pretty much all
she has to say'--Trace Adkins' 'I'm Tryin' (Music
Video)
This
gettin' up early, pulling double shifts / Gonna
make an old man of me long before I ever get rich
/ But I'm tryin' / It's been two years since we've
finalized / I still ain't used to puttin' ex in
front of wife / But I'm tryin' / Send more money
right away / is pretty much all she has to say when
she calls these days / and don't you be late
Another good divorced dad song is Trace Adkins'
I'm Tryin'--to watch the music video, click
here. The lyrics are below.
In the picture, the father has just spent some
nice time with his son, the ex-wife is coming to
pick the son up, and she's ripping him away from
his father and angrily criticizing her ex.
We'll put it in our divorced dad song collection,
along with Toby Keith's
Who's
That Man?, Tim McGraw's
Do
You Want Fries With That?, and Sting's
I'm
So Happy I Can't Stop Crying, which was also
later recorded by Toby Keith.
I'm Tryin'
Written by Chris Wallin, Jeffrey Steele and Anthony
Smith
Sung by Trace Adkins
This gettin up early, pulling double shifts,
Gonna make an old man of me long before I ever get
rich.
But I'm tryin
It's been two years since we've finalized,
I still ain't used to puttin ex in front of wife.
But I'm tryin.
Send more money right away, is pretty much all she
has to say when she
Calls these days and don't you be late
But all I can do, is all I can do and I keep
on tryin
And all I can be is all I can be and I keep on tryin
There's always a mountain in front of me,
Seems I'm always climbin and fallin and climbin
But I keep on tryin
I remember daddy sayin keep your eye on the ball,
run like hell, play to win,
Get up when you fall
I'm tryin
Don't say nothin that you can't take back
Never do anything you might regret
No don't do that
Daddy I'm tryin
Know the difference between heaven and hell
Go easy on the bottle be hard on yourself
And I know he meant well
But all I can do, is all I can do and I keep
on tryin
And all I can be is all I can be and I keep on tryin
There's always a mountain in front of me,
Seems I'm always climbin and fallin and climbin
But I keep on tryin
There's always a mountain in front of me
Seems I'm always climbin and stumblin
And then fallin'
And then climbin'
But I keep on tryin'
This gettin up early pullin double shifts
Gonna make an old man of me
Long before I ever get rich
But I'm tryin'
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Help
for Los Angeles/Orange County Dads--Because
They're Your Kids, Too
If you're a dad facing a divorce or separation
and you need quality legal representation
in Los Angeles or Orange County, the Law
Office of David Stone can help. Remember,
they're your kids, too.
www.help4dad.com
|
Why Do Legislators Raise, but Rarely Lower, Child
Support Guidelines?
High
child support guidelines are popular among politicians
because they make the candidate appear to be sensitive
to women's and children's concerns. But there are
other reasons why legislators support high child
support guidelines, particularly for high-earners--matching
federal funds.
States receive federal reimbursement funds for
their child support collection efforts, based on
numerous factors, including how much money they
collect in child support. Originally these federal
subsidies were for the purpose of rooting out "deadbeat
dads" and forcing them to pay. In reality, states
shoehorn as many noncustodial parents as possible
into the state systems, so that when these dads
pay their child support, the states can collect
federal subsidies for these "collections." This
is particularly true with high-earners--the states
get subsidies for the sizable monies collected,
without having to spend money on enforcement action.
In 2006, the then-Republican Congress reduced
federal subsidies to state child support enforcement
programs, as a budget-cutting measure. Currently
several Democratic Party presidential candidates--including
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards--are
pledging to restore these subsidies.
The newspaper column below explains the farce
of federal matching funds for child support collections.
Federal Child Support Enforcement Cuts
Will Hurt Bureaucrats, not Children
By Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks
Las Vegas Review-Journal, Riverside Press-Enterprise
(12/17/05)
Democrats, women's advocates, the National Governors
Association, and child support enforcement officials
are sounding the alarm over proposed cuts in the
federal funds that subsidize states' child support
enforcement efforts. The cuts, which recently passed
the House, will reduce federal reimbursement from
66% of the states' costs to 50% over five years.
According to the Congressional Budget Office,
this will lead to $24 billion in child support going
uncollected over the next 10 years. Texas Attorney
General Greg Abbott and Los Angeles County Child
Support Services Department Director Philip Browning
are warning that the cuts will mean a drastic reduction
in the amount of child support collected. A bipartisan
group of senators has penned a letter opposing the
cuts, explaining that "in 2004, more than $4 was
collected in support for every dollar invested in
the program." All of these claims, however, are
based on false assumptions and misleading data.
To read more and to discuss this issue on my
blog, click
here.
|