|
Erectile
Dysfunction? Hair Loss? The Men's Renaissance
Health Centers Can Help
The Men's Renaissance Health Centers are
a specialty medical facility dedicated to
the treatment of Men's Sexual Health, Hair
Transplantation, and Cosmetic Dermatology.
MRHC features the latest "Star Lux" Laser
technology for Facial Rejuvenation and Hair
Removal. Call (866) 398-6086 for
more info., and mention Glenn Sacks to receive
special rates.
Erectile
Dysfunction? Confidential Consultations,
Noninvasive Solutions
Men's Renaissance Heath Center specializes
in confidential consultations on Erectile
Dysfunction, Premature Ejaculation and Sexual
Potency. Unlike other clinics that focus
the patient on one invasive procedure featuring
constant injections, MRHC starts with a
thorough exam by a medical doctor and seeks
to find the most appropriate and least invasive
solution to the problem. Offering FDA approved
medications and devices, the MRHC makes
the process of recovering youthful performance
levels comfortable and rapid. Call (866)
398-6086 for more info., and mention
Glenn Sacks to receive special rates.
Hair Loss? Follicular Unit Transplantation
is the New Gold Standard
Follicular Unit Transplantation is the
newest technique of permanent surgical hair
restoration. With FUT, hair is transplanted
from the permanent zone in the back of the
scalp into balding areas, using only one's
own naturally occurring, individual follicular
units. This unique procedure provides what
we all want: hair that looks natural throughout,
no matter what we do or which way the wind
blows. Most importantly, transplanted hair
will continue to grow for the rest of the
patient's life. Call (866) 398-6086
for more info., and mention Glenn Sacks
to receive special rates.
|
Sacramento News & Review on the War Against
Low-Income DadsDavid E. Cook's article
Deadbroke dads: The system makes Darryl Gay pay
child support. But it's more than he can afford
and his daughter doesn't get the money. Is this
how it's supposed to work? (Sacramento News
& Review, 10/11/07) is an excellent description
of the way the current child support system wages
a ruthless war against low-income and minority fathers.
Cook focuses on the story of Darryl Gay--a loving
African-American father of modest means--and his
struggle to survive in the child support system
and be there for his six-year-old daughter. Cook
writes:
"Six-year-old Tynea fidgeted at the dinner table,
bored, counting a stack of crackers on her plate.
A Warner Bros. cartoon murmured faintly from the
living room of the Mack Road apartment where she
was visiting her father, Darryl Gay, for the weekend.
"Tynea's parents never married and broke up soon
after she was born. Gay, 41, continued to visit
his daughter almost daily, and, though there was
no child-support order, contributed to her upbringing
by buying diapers, clothes, formula and other necessities.
"'I was buying my daughter whatever she needed
because I was there every day,' Gay says. 'I knew
what her needs were. I was buying what she needed.'
"But then, Gay says, Tynea's mother moved out
of town without telling him, taking his daughter
and her six other children from different relationships
with her. Two years and two private investigators
later, Gay finally found Tynea living in Oakland
with her mother. He was eager to renew his relationship
with his daughter and begin contributing what he
could to her upbringing.
"That's when the welfare bureaucracy put its
boot up Gay's backside.
"After Tynea's mother moved to Oakland, she applied
for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, otherwise
known as welfare. Because of new regulations enacted
in the 1990s, she was required to name Tynea's father
to Alameda County welfare authorities. A court order
was issued requiring Gay to begin providing child
support and to reimburse any money paid to Tynea
by the state.
"Because Gay's whereabouts were unknown at the
time, he was unaware of the order. But when he tracked
down his daughter on his own accord, Alameda County
slapped him with a $227-per-month child-support
payment. As an in-home health aide, Gay makes $830
per month. That leaves him with just $603 to make
ends meet after paying child support. None of the
money he paid on his own in the past counts. But
here's the real rub: Most of the child support goes
not to Tynea or her mother, but to Alameda County.
Only $50 goes to Tynea.
"Welcome to welfare reform, American style.
"Thanks to a convoluted bureaucracy, flawed research
and our country's never-ending war on the poor,
Gay must now choose between providing care for his
daughter or obeying the law and reimbursing the
state for welfare paid to Tynea's mother over the
years. He is not alone. Our national obsession with
pursuing deadbeat dads is leaving many well-intentioned
fathers destitute, and even homeless.
"Call them deadbroke dads...
"Unfortunately, the child-support system does
not recognize the informal, undocumented assistance
fathers like Gay provide their children. The only
factor the system considers in measuring responsible
fatherhood is the payment of formal child support.
...
"Child-support orders are usually retroactive
to the day the child was born, and fathers are ordered
to reimburse the state for any public assistance
paid to the child. A father can owe back child support,
or in the jargon of the system, 'arrearages,' even
before the court issues a formal child-support order.
Private arrangements between parents are now ignored,
even with notarized documents.
"Glenn Sacks, host of
His Side with Glenn
Sacks, says even direct financial contributions
go unacknowledged.
"'I get e-mails and letters by the hundreds from
fathers who show canceled checks for child support
paid directly to the mother,' Sacks recounts, 'and
the state says, "That's a gift, and it doesn't count."
It's like sending him a Visa card with a $20,000
balance already on it.'"
Read Cook's full article
here. To learn more about the problems with
the child support system, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
The American Coalition for
Fathers and Children
The American Coalition for
Fathers and Children is
dedicated to creating a
family law system which
promotes equal rights for
all parties affected by
divorce. Contact the ACFC
at 1-800-978-3237 or visit
them on the web at
www.acfc.org. |
|
Parenting
Plan Calendar Software
Shared Ground (R) is
an easy-to-use software
program designed for divorced
parents to track their parenting
plan schedules over many
years. Do-it-yourself or
let us build your approved
parenting plan into a multi-year
calendar so that you can
print, share, or modify
the calendar later. Parents,
attorneys, arbitrators and
mediators can generate equitable
parenting plans, which is
especially useful for parents
seeking fair division of
their children's time. FREE
ASSISTANCE TO OUR CLIENTS-
$49.95 one-time charge,
FREE TRIAL & MONEY-BACK
GUARANTEE. Click
here for more information.
|
|
|
Even More Feminist Hysterics Over My Interview on
VAWA
Background:
I've discussed the backlash against me in the feminist
blogosphere--particularly from Amanda Marcotte of
Pandagon--since Pajamas Media advice columnist Dr.
Helen Smith interviewed me recently on the subject
of the Violence Against Women Act, the way our legal
system handles domestic violence, and related issues.
The interview is
Fighting for Men's Rights (Pajamas
Media, 10/8/07). To learn more about the debate,
click
here.
Ardent feminist blogger Jeff Fecke (pictured)
Friday published yet another attack on me over my
comments on the Violence Against Women Act, as well
as an attack on the men's movement in general--click
here to read it. Radical feminist blogger Amanda
Marcotte picked up and praised the post
here. Fecke's post is in the form of a Q & A
with himself. Here's one section:
Q: So [men's activists] agitate for the right
to rape and assault?
A: Not in so many words. But the MRAs do certainly
seem preoccupied by the loss of that privilege.
Look at the Glenn Sacks/Helen Smith interview we
talked about early this week. It was all about how
the Violence Against Women Act is a debacle for
men, because, they say, men get sent to jail unfairly
in domestic disputes. VAWA is a traditional hobby-horse
for the MRA set...
Q: So are MRAs concerned about anything other
than raping and beating women?
A: Oh, sure -- they also don't want to pay child
support. There's a huge segment of MRAdom that's
fed by divorced men angry that their ex got custody
of the kids, and now they have to fork over money
to support them.
Once again, Fecke and Marcotte are accusing me
of being sympathetic to men's "right" to abuse,
batter and rape women. Seeing the vitriol and hysteria
in the various posts over the past week, I asked
myself, "What the hell did I say that was so terrible?"
and I went back and looked at the interview. The
full interview can be seen
here, but the part that the feminist bloggers
have been so angry about is the first part of my
answer to Helen Smith's question, "The Violence
Against Women Act (VAWA) passed in the 1990's under
President Clinton. How is that working out?" I replied:
"It's done some good, in that it has helped ensure
funding for domestic violence programs and shelters
for battered women, but it has also helped create
many problems, particularly for fathers and their
children.
"To pick one example, the restraining order issue
is a nightmare. The father is booted out of the
marital home and pushed to the margins of his children's
lives. The orders are often based on false accusations,
and are used as custody maneuvers or as punitive
measures by angry soon-to-be-ex-wives.
"Some judges simply rubber stamp protection order
requests. One example is the David Letterman case
from a couple years ago, where a judge granted a
lunatic woman a restraining order against Letterman
because she said he was sending her harassing messages
through his TV broadcasts. District Judge Daniel
Sanchez, who issued the order, explained, 'If [applicants]
make a proper pleading, then I grant it.' As if
what matters is not the accused's guilt or innocence,
but instead whether the accuser knows how to fill
out a form properly.
"Other judges may doubt the veracity of the charges
but nevertheless decide to 'err on the side of caution'
by granting them. VAWA and VAWA-funded DV service
providers have contributed greatly to the restraining
order problem."
In re-reading it, I can't say I'd change a word.
Funny how none of my critics leave in the part where
I praised VAWA for having "done some good, in that
it has helped ensure funding for domestic violence
programs and shelters for battered women." Nor do
they include my later comment in the interview where
I called the battered women's shelter movement of
the 1970s a "very heroic movement."
The feminists have made much of my Letterman
example, saying it doesn't apply because the woman
was not an intimate partner of Letterman's. This
is a valid point, but it wasn't where I was going
with it. My point was that restraining orders are
passed out with so little judicial review that even
this lunatic could get one. I pointed to the judge's
comment, "If [applicants] make a proper pleading,
then I grant it" as another example of the lack
of judicial review. The lack of judicial review
over restraining orders has been criticized by many
family law professionals, including the Family Law
Section of the State Bar of California--to learn
more, click
here.
The feminists have also been saying that I'm
in favor of "banning" restraining orders. Not so,
and I'm on the record on numerous occasions saying
that restraining orders can be a helpful tool to
protect battered women--to learn more, click
here.
My criticism is not that they exist, but that they
are being misused.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Another Wonderful Example of a Loyal Wife--Peggy
PolinskyIn my post
Two
Heroic Wives Remained Loyal to Their Husbands as
They Served Three Decades in Prison for a Crime
They Didn't Commit, I commended the heroism
of two women who remained loyal to their husbands
for three decades as the men were incarcerated
for crimes the FBI knew they didn't commit. Both
women raised their children, and kept up theirs
and their children's relationships with their husbands
as best they could.
Here's another wonderful example of a loyal wife--Peggy
Polinsky:
Wife's kidney donation saves husband's life
By Emanuel Parker
Pasadena Star-News, (10/7/07)
PASADENA - For two years, Joel Polinsky's stomach
was so big, children would ask if he was pregnant.
"Yes," he'd tell them. "I'm going to have triplets."
But far from being funny, the Pasadena resident's
condition was deadly. What saved his life was a
kidney donation in June from his wife, Peggy, 63.
"You only need one kidney, but you have two,"
she said. "If you know someone who has none, give
them one."
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Schwarzenegger Acts to Protect Goldfish, Hamsters
Caught in Abusive Relationships
"In
the American family, the mother comes first, then
the kids, then the dog, then the cat, and then the
father."--Tomas, my Cuban immigrant father-in-law
I guess we can now add the family hamster and
goldfish in there before the father, too. Recently
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger took strong
measures to protect goldfish, hamsters, bunny rabbits,
cats, and dogs who are caught in abusive relationships
by signing SB 353. Schwarzenegger joins Connecticut
Governor M. Jodi Rell and others who have focused
on this scourge, and realized the threat domestic
violence poses to hamsters like little Cinnamon
(pictured).
Earlier this year, Rell signed a bill to
protect pet victims
of domestic violence. She explained:
"Pets are too
often the silent victims of domestic violence. They
cannot fight back, and they are presently afforded
no protection under our current legal system."
No, the above is not an Onion parody,
it's real. To Rell's credit, however, she has declined
to sign on to the ridiculous feminist charade that
only men commit domestic violence. Earlier
this year she commented, "Domestic violence cuts
across all races, all income brackets, all levels
of education -- and both sexes." To learn more,
see my blog post
Good
News--Pro Feminist Governor Acknowledges Women Also
Commit Domestic Violence.
Earlier this year I co-authored a column on SB
353--CA
Legislators Vote to Protect Pets from Domestic Violence
but Deny Services to Male DV Victims (Long
Beach Press-Telegram, 4/21/07).
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
Goldberg & Associates--the
Parental Alienation
Specialists
If you're the target
of Parental Alienation,
the Parental Alienation
specialists at Goldberg
& Associates can
help. They operate
throughout the U.S.
and Canada and assist
family law attorneys
and targeted parents
needing medical-legal
consulting services
related to Parental
Alienation. Call
them at 905.481.0367
or visit their website
www.parentalalienation.ca. |
Jeff Leving's New
Book--Divorce
Wars
Jeffery M. Leving,
one of America's
most prominent divorce
lawyers, has written
a new book on how
to win any divorce
fairly, even when
your spouse brings
out the heavy artillery.
Divorce Wars: A
Field Guide to the
Winning Tactics,
Preemptive Strikes,
and Top Maneuvers
When Divorce Gets
Ugly provides
essential advice
on everything from
picking the right
lawyer and devising
a winning settlement
strategy to getting
the most from your
day in court and
dealing with an
ex-spouse.
Divorce Wars
is available
here. |
Help, Resources
for Dads
The
National Fathers'
Resource Center
is a division of
Fathers For Equal
Rights, Inc.
(FER), located in
Dallas, Texas, with
offices in both
Dallas and Houston.
In existence for
over three decades,
it has services
and resources for
dads nationwide
and is one of the
largest and most
active fathers'
rights organizations
in the U.S.
www.fathers4kids.org
|
|
|
|
A
Psycho Sports Dad?
While writing my blog post
The
'sexism' was that the boys didn't believe that a
girl could do dangerous skateboard stunts...'
, I was reminded of another revealing incident.
My son and I were at the skateboard park on a Saturday
morning, and this little kid--looked like he was
only five or six years old--climbed to the top of
this huge skateboard ramp. The little kid had all
of his protective gear on, etc., but when he got
to the top of the ramp he didn't go down.
His father, who was standing 10 or 20 feet from
the ramp, told him, "C'mon, you can do it, get going!"
The kid hesitated, says he's scared, so dad says
it again, and again the kid hesitates.
I'm standing there watching this and thinking
this guy is a psycho sports dad pushing his kid
too hard. The standoff continued, and I started
to wonder if I should intervene.
Finally the kid says, "Oh, ok," and starts to
push off. I hold my breath, expecting a crash and
some broken bones.
Instead, the boy zips down the huge ramp, makes
one jump, then another, then another, then spins
his board around and heads back, all the while looking
as concerned as he would on a casual stroll in the
park.
There are few times in my life when I was happier
to feel like a jackass...
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
The Marcotte Controversy--More Lunacy from Their
Side, and Now Some Lunacy from 'Our' Side
Background: I've discussed the backlash against
me in the feminist blogosphere--particularly from
Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon--since Pajamas Media
advice columnist Dr. Helen Smith interviewed me
recently on the subject of the Violence Against
Women Act, the way our legal system handles domestic
violence, and related issues. The interview is
Fighting for Men's Rights (Pajamas Media, 10/8/07).
To learn more about the debate, click
here.
More
amazing stuff from both sides of the aisle regarding
the controversy over my comments in the interview.
This afternoon Amanda Marcotte let loose another
absolutely insane tirade, writing:
"Look, I know you supporters of wife beating
will never admit that you actually think that--well,
in public. Between friends and certainly to intimates
is a different story. We are well aware of this
tactic. The anti-choicer claims to love babies in
public while acting as if he's mainly interested
in punishing women for sex. The racist swears up
and down that he's not a racist even while privately
believing that black people are stupid and using
the word 'nigger' behind closed doors. And the battering
advocates claim to oppose wife-beating while organizing
to make sure that battered wives get thrown in jail
or are deprived of escape routes.
"I judge you by your policy ideas. You want to
throw women in jail for saving themselves. You want
to deprive women of basic safety measures to escape
wife beaters. You used coded language that reflects
the 'bitch had it coming' mentality. Others might
not see through you, especially if you say, 'But
I'm a liberal', as if self-proclaimed liberals can't
have blind spots. But by focusing steel-like on
your actual ideas instead of your bullshit justifications,
I can see right through you."
Just as my disgust and disappointment with Marcotte
reaches its peak, some hate-filled lunatic from
"our" side goes so over the top that I find myself
feeling sympathy for Amanda. On Amanda's blog, "Benjamin"
writes:
"Amanda, why are you so angry that you are hideously
unattractive? What? Nothing to say about the innocence
of the Duke athletes? Well, being a cunt and misinformed
suits you well. Edwards was right to fire you. At
least now I can support him. Your boyfriend is quite
a pathetic man, if you can call him a man. What
do you do, cuckhold him? Beat him while he is tied
up with a rubber ball in his mouth? Or do you like
ass to mouth sex? Just checking."
What a lunatic. For the record, Amanda is
not unattractive, it wouldn't matter if
she were, and she deserves to have her arguments
judged on their merits. I frankly get sick and tired
of misogynistic men insulting women's looks simply
because they disagree with them.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|

|
Families Against Confiscatory Child
Support (FACCS)
FACCS is the national voice for
fair and reasonable child support.
FACCS believes all parents have
an obligation to support their children
financially. However, in high income
cases, state and federal laws often
result in excessive awards that
are effectively alimony in disguise
and have little to do with supporting
children. Huge child support awards
lead to protracted custody disputes,
undermines co-parenting, and leaves
children worse off financially.
www.faccsonline.org /
contact@faccsonline.org
|
|
The
Fatherhood Movement & Underdog Social Movements
in History (Part I: Labor Unions & the 'Battle of
Deputies Run')
Being
committed to a movement which has not yet come into
its prime--the fatherhood movement--I'm sometimes
interested in the stories of the unlikely successes
of other social movements.
One of the biggest underdog movements in history
to succeed, though we don't talk about it much,
is the industrial labor movement.
Most of the big industrial unions were built
during the 1930s, under conditions which, in retrospect,
seem mind-boggling. It was done amid massive unemployment
and widespread poverty. Unionists had to face off
against unscrupulous, lawless bosses and their violent
hired thugs, as well as hostile and sometimes violent
police. Workers utilized strikes, sit-downs and
other methods to build strong, vibrant labor unions.
I think one could fairly say that, given what these
men achieved, it is impossible to ever claim that
any reasonable movement cannot succeed.
One of the key battles in the rise of the labor
movement is the famous Teamsters strike in Minneapolis
in 1934 (pictured). There striking workers and their
supporters squared off against police and company-hired
thugs in what's known as the "Battle of Deputies
Run." At the time, truck drivers worked a six day,
60 hour week for less than $75 a month. They had
little or no pensions, benefits or workplace safety
protections. According to the New Deal Network:
"In Minneapolis and St. Paul, the traditional
open shop [anti-union] labor principle was militantly
maintained until 1934. Then, in May of that year,
Local 574 of the Teamsters' Union ordered a strike
and promptly paralyzed the trucking industry in
Minneapolis.
"The highlight of the strike was the battle in
the market district, where between 20,000 and 30,000
people watched or participated in what became known
as the 'Battle of Deputies Run.'
"Pickets, police, and deputized businessmen joined
the conflict in which two of the citizens' army
were killed and scores of strikers wounded. Complaining
that no settlement of the larger issues had been
attained, truckers struck again in the following
July. This time the killing of two pickets and the
wounding of 48 brought martial law. Well organized
and supported by several farmers' organizations,
the union finally achieved a substantial advantage."
The victory secured Minneapolis as a union town
and brought great benefits to working class families.
And no, the subsequent degeneration and corruption
of the Teamsters does not diminish what the 1934
strikers accomplished.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
 |
Online Dating Rights
Online Dating Rights
opposes the new federal
International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act, which requires
Americans who seek to meet
foreigners via the internet
to have a criminal background
check and an intrusive report
about intimate details of
one's life BEFORE any communication--the
first time in US history
that such checks have been
required.
www.onlinedatingrights.com
|
|
|
Fair
Enough: Ex-Wife of 'Deadbeat Dad' Has Her Say
Dear Mr. Sacks:
I have been a fan of your site and cause for
several years now as I am a remarried stepmom of
two wonderful teenage girls. Though my husband's
work causes us to move around the country (and currently
to live in Toronto, Canada), he makes sure he talks
to his girls several times a week, emails with them,
IM's, visits them in their home state at least twice
a year, they visit us at least 4 times a year and
most of all, he has ALWAYS paid his child support
every month without fail. And he is able to do all
of this against some pretty tough battles with his
ex-wife. But....he refuses to let his relationship
with his children be taken from him.
My husband is also a wonderful stepfather to
my 3 teenage children. He attends their school events,
their sports meets, pays for their clothes, gives
them an allowance...he does everything a true father
would do. And why does he do this? First and foremost,
because he loves them. But second, because they
need him. Their own biological father has abandoned
them financially, physically, and emotionally.
At one time, we all lived just outside of Chicago.
My ex had asked for only once a month visitation,
every other Christmas, his birthday, Father's Day,
and the kids on their birthday, every other year.
He also asked for two weeks of consecutive visitation
to be taken anytime during the year (summer break).
He rarely took the once a month visitation, preferring
to attend a soccer game and then go back home. He
has never had them on Christmas, never had them
for summer break, has had them on his birthday and
Father's Day a couple of times, and has had only
one child, once, on her birthday.
And then.....as if he wasn't uninvolved enough,
he and his girlfriend packed up and moved to Mississippi.
He quit his $100,000/year job to start his own business
(where everything is in the girlfriend's name, including
their house, their cars, their bank accounts) and
be paid as an independent contractor at the rate
of about $25,000/year. He is clearly underpaid for
his education and experience, but this way he can
avoid paying child support should the enforcement
agency ever catch up with him. The last time he
exercised his visitation was January 2004 and he
hasn't paid support since November 2002.
To make matters even worse is the fact that my
20-year-old, though too old to technically qualify
for child support, has been ill and unable to work
or attend school for nearly a year. She is under
doctors orders to remain at home until fully recovered.
And my oldest son has just been checked into an
inpatient facility for his emerging mental illness
at a cost of $11,000/month. Insurance only covers
25%. But my ex-husband contributes nothing to these
costs.
While I live with a man who should never be called
a "deadbeat", I also have children whose father
can be called nothing but "DEADBEAT." I am all for
your cause and read your site regularly, but please
remember, there ARE men out there whose face should
appear on the Wikipedia page when you search for
"deadbeat dad." My ex-husband is one of them.
Regards,
Sheila
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Chris
Rock on Marriage (Video)
"Men,
don't argue--you cannot win. You cannot beat a woman
in an argument--it's impossible. You will not win.
Because men, we are handicapped when it comes to
arguing, because we have a need to make sense. Women
aren't going to let a little thing like
sense screw-up their argument."--Chris Rock
Chris Rock has some amusing thoughts on marriage
in
this comedy clip. He covers money, arguing,
how to keep a woman happy, jobs, sex, and other
issues. (Warning--much of this monologue is obscene.)
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|
Alicia M. Crowe's Real Dads Stand
Up!
Alicia M. Crowe's new book Real
Dads Stand Up! explains what
every single father should know
about child support, rights and
custody. Learn how to exercise your
legal rights, avoid 'baby mama drama',
navigate the child support system,
gain and maintain access to your
children, and settle issues without
going to trial.
www.realdadsstandup.com |
|
Fathers' Rights Legal Help
If you need help with divorce, child
custody, child support, alimony
and visitation issues,
The Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving,
Ltd. is one of the only law
firms in the country focused almost
exclusively on fathers' rights in
divorce. Leving did heroic work
on the Elian Gonzalez case, helping
reunite Elian with his father. He
also co-authored Illinois' Joint
Custody Law, and was named one of
"America's Best Lawyers" by Forbes
Radio. Leving is the author of
Fathers' Rights: Hard Hitting and
Fair Advice for Every Father Involved
in a Custody Dispute. Call
today for an initial consultation
(312) 807-3990 or visit us on the
web at
www.dadsrights.com.
|
|
Daddy's Bedtime Story #1: Racism and Little
Joe Morgan
Background:
I'm starting a blog-based collection of
bedtime stories for children, both stories
I've told my kids and stories that other
parents (and grandparents) tell their kids.
If you've got a good bedtime story, please
send it to me for consideration in this
collection.
The core of these stories will be
those I tell my 9-year-old daughter. She's
pretty demanding--some weeks I pretty much
have to come up with a bedtime story every
night, which isn't easy. My daughter is
very interested in racism (which she's studied
in school), baseball, and daddy's childhood,
so many of the stories reflect those. She's
only 9, but she enjoys learning about adult
issues. Sometimes if I tell her a story
she thinks isn't sufficiently adult, she'll
say, "C'mon dad, that's just a baby story."
The stories I tell are usually just
things that I remembered, sometimes recent
but often from 20 or 30 years ago. Some
of them are stories my father told me when
I was a kid.
I write these down as I told them,
and they are NOT up to my usual standards
of journalistic accuracy--given the limits
of human memory, many (if not most) probably
have at least one factual error in them,
sometimes far more. They are also simplistic.
I'm not going back and fixing them to make
them more accurate or nuanced--they are
here as I told them.
If you have a bedtime story you'd
like to add to my collection, please send
it to me at
glenn@glennsacks.com. With
your submission, please let me know how
you want to be identified, if at all.
Racism and Little Joe Morgan
One of the things that happens sometimes
that's bad is racial profiling. That's when
police judge somebody by their race instead
of who they are as a person. And sometimes
they do bad things to black people because
of it. One example is what happened to Joe
Morgan.
When I was a kid, the best baseball player
in all of baseball was Joe Morgan. He was
a great second baseman for the Cincinnati
Reds, who were the Dodgers' main rival.
I was a big Dodger fan as a kid, but the
Reds usually beat us. Anyway, one amazing
thing about Joe Morgan was that he was so
small--only 5'7". No bigger than your big
brother or your mother.
I remember one time outside your brother's
school there was a little kid sitting with
a baseball glove sitting all alone, looking
very, very sad. I asked him why he wasn't
playing with the other boys, and he told
me they said he was too small. I told him
the story of "Little Joe Morgan"--the small
baseball player, the National League Most
Valuable Player of 1975 and 1976.
Anyway, one time long after Joe's career
was over, he flew in on a plane to Los Angeles.
He got off the plane and was making a phone
call when a cop came up to him, grabbed
him from behind, threw him on the floor,
and handcuffed him behind his back. Imagine
how humiliated he was lying on the floor
of the airport with his hands behind his
back, all the passengers staring at him.
The cops were rather dense--people were
coming up to them and telling them that
this was Joe Morgan, the famous baseball
player, and they still wouldn't let him
go. They arrested him because he fit the
profile of a black drug dealer they were
waiting to arrest.
Eventually they let him go. Morgan demanded
an apology, and when they didn't give it
to him, he sued. He won, and his lawsuit
helped limit racial profiling.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Help
for Los
Angeles/Ventura
County Dads
Certified
Family Law
Specialist
Peter M.
Walzer was
one of the
key figures
in our successful
legislative
struggle
to preserve
the LaMusga
move-away
decision.
As Chair
of the State
Bar of California
Family Law
Section
Executive
Committee,
Walzer lobbied
the state
legislature
to improve
California
laws on
child support
and child
custody.
He's an
American
Academy
of Matrimonial
Lawyers
Fellow who
has authored
numerous
articles
on custody
issues,
business
valuation
in marital
dissolutions
and spousal
and child
support.
www.California-Divorce.com
|
The LaMusga
Company
The LaMusga
Company
provides
customized
solutions
to assist
individuals
and business
owners in
reaching
their financial
goals. The
LaMusga
Company
is committed
to helping
you accomplish
your long-term
financial
objectives.
LaMusgaCo.com
|
|
|
|
The Danes Have Some Clever Ideas...
Amy
Alkon, the Advice Goddess, points out
that Denmark has come up with a clever new
way to stop people from speeding. I'd describe
it, but it's better that you see it yourselves.
To watch, click
here.
The Danes have some clever ideas. I had
a Danish college roommate in the mid-80s
who told me about a Danish politician who
could accurately be described as one of
the world's truest Libertarians. He opposed
all government spending and taxes. He said
Denmark should abolish all government social
programs as well as the military, and replace
the entire Danish Army with a telephone
answering machine that said, "We Surrender"
in Russian. Funny guy...
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
Dr.
Warren Farrell's
Shared Parenting
Evidence
Kit--What
You Need
to Win Shared
Physical
Custody
Dr. Warren
Farrell,
a top expert
on children
of divorce
now offers
a complete
evidence
kit to help
you win
shared custody.
The DVDs,
audio CD
and electronic
files summarize
the best
scientific
research
available
collected
over decades.
Scientific
research
has proven
that children
do far better
with near
equal time
with both
parents
with minimal
conditions.
This video
set was
developed
to educate
parents,
judges,
lawyers,
psychologists
and other
divorce
professionals.
Most judges
are doing
exactly
what is
worst for
children
with sole-custody.
Submitted
as evidence
this will
maximize
your chances.
Divorce
Reform groups
call(508)
381-1450
to use as
fundraiser.
www.BestInterestofChildren.org
|
|
|
 |
Help for Michigan Dads
Michigan family law
attorney Mindy L. Hitchcock
has experience fighting
for noncustodial parents
against Michigan's abusive
FOC. Her
holistic approach to
divorce gets results for
her clients while avoiding
the scorched earth approach
to law that leaves families
emotionally and financially
devastated.
Lady4Justice.com
|
|
|
More on Frivolous Domestic Violence
Prosecutions
Background: Since the mid-90s,
many states have adopted aggressive
arrest procedures on domestic violence
calls. Police officers are often
encouraged to make arrests in petty
incidents, often where the abuse
is mutual or it is unclear who the
aggressor was. They also are under
political pressure to arrest men,
not women. Moreover, many prosecutors
follow "No Drop" policies in domestic
violence cases, pursuing marginal
cases which ordinarily would be
dropped for lack of evidence. To
learn more, see my co-authored column
Texas bill to create domestic
violence offender registry will
harm innocent men (Austin
American-Statesman, 4/11/07)
or click
here or
here.
In a letter to the Marin
Independent Journal ("Exploiting
Marin jurors," 6/28/07), Suzanne
Gassner Weatherford, a Marin, California
juror, blasted "politically correct"
prosecutors for wasting jurors'
time with a ludicrous, politically
motivated, evidence-free domestic
violence prosecution. She wrote:
"It is an injustice to our justice
system to bring frivolous criminal
prosecutions to the courtroom. Last
week, I spent three days as a juror
in a case in which it seemed obvious
early on that no conviction could
possibly result.
"A woman had called 911 complaining
her fiance had been drinking and
pushed her onto their bed. The defendant
claimed he held her arms to keep
her from hitting him with a phone.
The next day, the woman phoned police
and the district attorney's office
asking that her fiance not be prosecuted.
She stated that she had overreacted,
and that she would do anything she
could to stop the prosecution. True
to her word, she came to court with
an attorney and refused to answer
any questions, claiming that to
do so would be self-incriminating.
Nonetheless, the case proceeded.
"The only other witness the prosecution
had was a policeman who had heard
the woman's original complaint.
Part of his testimony was contradicted
by facts that could be ascertained
from the 911 recording. To convict
required the jury to find that there
was no reasonable doubt that the
man had pushed the woman onto their
bed. Ten of the jurors heard the
woman's call as a manipulative expression
of anger. Two jurors agreed with
the prosecutor that they heard fear
in her voice. The outcome of the
case rested on this subjective factor.
In the jury room, some of us speculated
about why this case had ever been
brought to court."
John Hamel, LCSW, of the
National Family Violence Legislative
Resource Center, wrote a response
to the paper, in which he criticizes
mandatory arrest policies:
Domestic violence problems
I am a licensed clinical social
worker who has, since 1992, led
and supervised batterer intervention
programs in three Bay Area counties
(including Marin) for individuals
convicted of domestic violence.
My clients have included numerous
offenders, male and female, who
had engaged in serious, repeat violence,
both physical and emotional, upon
their victims.
However, other clients have engaged
in far less serious abuse. In many
cases, they were merely defending
themselves or retaliating following
a physical attack upon them. In
my experience, the domestic violence
case that Suzanne Weatherford discussed
in her letter (IJ, June 30,
"Exploiting Marin jurors") is not
at all unusual.
Domestic violence is a serious
social problem, and a large body
of research evidence has demonstrated
the positive effects of arrest,
perpetrator treatment and victim
services in reducing domestic violence
in our cities.
However, a number of researchers,
including such respected national
figures as Eve Buzawa and Linda
Mills, have questioned the value
of mandatory arrest policies such
as those in effect in California.
Under these policies, too many individuals
are arrested, even against the wishes
of their partners, and compelled
to attend batterer treatment when
alternatives, such as diversion,
family counseling or restorative
justice, would have been far more
appropriate.
The time has come for all of
us involved in the prevention and
treatment of domestic violence to
re-examine our policies. We can
protect victims without adversely
harming families. It can be done.
John Hamel, San Rafael
To discuss this issue on my blog,
click
here.
The Sacrifices Men Make to Support
Their Families--Bruce Springsteen's
'Factory' (Video)
Bruce
Springsteen says he wrote the song
"Factory" for his father, a New
Jersey factory worker. Many of Springsteen's
songs chronicle the ways his father
and other working class men struggle
to support their families.
Springsteen originally performed
the song as a piano ballad on his
1978 album Darkness at the Edge
of Town, but performs it here
almost as a Country Western song.
He's accompanied by the Seeger Sessions
Band.
Springsteen sings:
"Early in the morning factory
whistle blows,
Man rises from bed and puts on his
clothes,
Man takes his lunch, walks out in
the morning light,
It's the working, the working, just
the working life.
"Through the mansions of fear,
through the mansions of pain,
I see my daddy walking through them
factory gates in the rain,
Factory takes his hearing, factory
gives him life,
The working, the working, just the
working life."
To watch the video, click
here or see below.
To discuss this issue on my blog,
click
here.
|
|
Are You the Target of Parental Alienation?
Parental alienation cases are among
the most difficult and complicated
in family law.
J. Michael Bone, Ph.D., is an
expert on parental alienation. If
you're a target parent, he can help
you get back into your children's
lives. Bone has worked as a custody
evaluator and as a therapist and
knows how to help the court find
the truth. His services are available
throughout the U.S. Dr. Bone can
be reached by phone at (407) 645-0662
or by email by clicking
here.
www.jmbconsulting.org
|
Help for Colorado Dads
As someone who has personally
experienced the heartbreak
of divorce and family breakup,
Brett W. Martin, Esq.
works to advance the interests
and concerns of fathers
in domestic and family law
litigation. Personal attention
is given to clients to help
them through a very difficult
time in their lives.
www.brettwmartin.com
|
|
|
Another
'Men as Lousy Parents' TV Commercial
Ned
Holstein of
Fathers
& Families first pointed out the "Man Mom" advertising
campaign to me. The campaign is for Combos Snacks,
and is another example of the common TV theme of
men as irresponsible, uncaring parents.
In the ads, whatever the problem (illness, stress,
whatever) the only solution the male parent can
come up with is Combos Snacks--"What your mom would
feed you if your mom were a man."
To watch the ad, click
here.
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
|
My Family Has Two Houses...and
I'm Okay
A workshop for children
of separation or divorce
in a workbook! In the privacy
of your own home, you can
provide your child with
a safe way of looking at
their thoughts and feelings
and help to open
discussion of relevant issues
for them with you. This
workbook can make the difference
between your child surviving
your divorce and thriving
despite it! To learn more
about My family has
two houses ...and I'm Okay!
and to order, click
here. |
|
How to Win Shared Custody
Here are the litigation
secrets to winning shared
physical & legal custody
from Boston trial lawyer
Nick Palermo, Esquire
who has won
these cases for 24 years.
It costs $5,000. or more
in legal fees to gain the
knowledge and guidance contained
in this $10 handbook--The
Ten Essential Elements to
Winning Joint Shared Physical
and Legal Custody.
www.TenEssentialElements.com
|
|
|
Hall of Fame Pitcher Jim Palmer, on His Dad
During
my youth, Jim Palmer (pictured) was pretty much
the best pitcher in baseball, with the possible
exception of Tom Seaver. He was usually the first
starting pitcher we'd draft whenever I played Strat-O-Matic
table baseball with my friends. From 1970 to 1978,
Palmer went 176-97, and was voted into the Hall
of Fame in 1990.
Soon after Palmer was born he had been adopted
by Moe and Polly Wiesen. Moe died when he was nine,
and the following year his mother married Max Palmer.
Jim Palmer tells the following story about his dad
in his autobiography, Palmer and Weaver:
"My father loves to tell this story. It was the
Little League banquet in California. When it came
time to announce the awards that night, I was going
to get three trophies, one for the championship
we'd won, one for the batting title, and one for
the homerun leader.
"But I wasn't Jim Palmer, I was still Jim Wiesen.
My mom had married Max Palmer but I had kept my
name. Until that night. I asked the coaches who
handed out the awards to announce me by what I decided
was my new name, 'James Alvin Palmer.'
"On his 87th birthday, Max said, 'Through all
these years, that night was the highlight of my
life.'
"[Eighteen years later] that was the name that
went on my first Cy Young Award. Palmer. My dad
Max loved it."
To discuss this issue on my blog, click
here.
'If the family court system had even once punished
her for false allegations, maybe my family would
not have suffered so much'
Background:
The California Judicial Council's Domestic Violence
Practice and Procedures Task Force invited comments
on its Draft Guidelines and Recommended Practices
for Improving the Administration of Justice in Domestic
Violence Cases. There's a big problem with the Draft
Guidelines--they don't deal with the false allegations
issue.
In June, I urged my readers to write to the
Task Force and urge them to consider the massive
problem false allegations represent in their report.
Several hundred of you wrote letters. I have asked
for and received permission from several of those
who wrote the Task Force to include their letters
in my blog. All letters are published anonymously.
To learn more, see my original call to action
Act Now: Major New Report on Domestic Violence,
Family Law, Restraining Orders Doesn't Even
Mention False Allegations! or click
here.
From "Don," a reader:
"Dear Task Force:
Five years ago, I was dating a woman. At the
time we had been seeing each other for a couple
of years. She had turned 38, and I noticed a big
change in her but wasn't really interested in talking
with her about it. She had stopped taking birth
control pills, became pregnant, and had our child.
She immediately began a full blown attempt to destroy
me, and stated that I would never see our child.
"A series of Family Court dates began to follow
where one false allegation followed another. At
this time, I think I have been to court 24 or 25
times. I was able to demonstrate to the court each
time that the allegations were in fact, not legitimate.
At the hearing before last, Judge Angela Jewell
stated to the mother that she was concerned about
the lack of support of the mother for our daughter's
relationship with me.
"Later, the allegations turned into those of a sexual
nature, and now I'm facing a trial, with the only
evidence being a statement my daughter made, to
a therapist, hired by the mother.
"If the family court system would have one time
punished the other party for false allegations,
maybe my business, |