Top Stories |
Fathers &
Families Shared Parenting Bill to Be Heard
Fathers & Families' Shared
Parenting Bill HB
1400 will be heard this coming Thursday (9/17). Massachusetts is one of the
worst states in the country for Shared Parenting and for fathers, but Fathers &
Families has nevertheless made considerable progress there. This includes:
Over one-quarter of the Massachusetts Legislature has expressed clear,
public support for Fathers & Families' Shared Parenting Bill, many of them
signing on as co-sponsors.
Fathers & Families gathered thousands of signatures to place shared
parenting on the 2004 Massachusetts ballot and led a successful campaign for
its passage, winning 86% of the vote.
Fathers & Families persuaded the Boston Globe to become first
major newspaper in the United States to endorse Shared Parenting in
principle in an editorial (Feb 23, 2008).
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick told the Legislature that if they
pass Fathers & Families' Shared Parenting, he will sign it.
Fathers & Families recently met with Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick
concerning Shared Parenting and related topics.
Fathers & Families pushed "Shared Parenting" to the number one issue on
the Massachusetts Governor's website for citizen input.
Fathers & Families ignited a debate in the Massachusetts Democratic Party
over Shared Parenting, leading to a spirited, 40 minute debate on the floor
of the 2009 Massachusetts Democratic Party Convention and winning 40% of the
Convention's vote.
Many of our members have expressed interest in attending the September 17 hearing. Fathers & Families will be well represented at the hearing, but this is not the place for a mass turnout.
The bill will not be voted on for a few months--in the interim period we will launch a legislative education campaign. We will want your participation in this campaign and will be releasing the details on how you can participate in coming weeks. Save your time and energy for the post-hearing campaign!
Ned Holstein, M.D., M.S.
Founder and Chair of the Board
Glenn Sacks, MA
Executive Director

Private
Child Support Collection Firm Accused of Scamming Innocent Fathers
"[Private child support collection] companies often inflate child support
debts by charging unauthorized interest on decades-old debts and extort
payments that the companies know that parents do not owe. They undermine
regular payments being made by the parents and sabotage these parents' often
tenuous toe-hold in the mainstream economy."--The Center for Law and Social
Policy (CLASP)
Private child support collection companies are one of
the more noxious plagues afflicting divorced parents. In 2008, Fathers &
Families led a successful campaign against Fox, which planned to air Bad
Dads, a show which would glorify the role of private child support
collectors. Fox dropped the show in the wake of our protests, which made 300
newspapers.
In April of this year, Lifetime announced plans to air the same show,
rechristened Deadbeat Dads.
Again Fathers & Families led a highly-publicized campaign against the show.
Our Lifetime campaign was apparently successful--we had been told that
Lifetime planned to begin airing the show in late July or early August, and
it's now mid-September. To learn more, see our campaign page here.
As we noted during the campaign, private child support collection
agencies often manhandle fathers and exploit and deceive custodial mothers.
In fact, women's advocates, including the National Organization for Women,
have repeatedly condemned these agencies for mistreating women.
Apparently we can now add Child Support Services of Atlanta to the list.
From the Courthouse
News Service (9/9/09):
Child Support Services of Atlanta used the U.S. mail to wantonly
mislead parents into believing it is a state agency and persuade them to
send it child support payments, which its owner Stuart Clay Cole stole
for himself, the Post Office claims. The federal complaint claims Cole's
company has offices in Georgia and 12 other states, and used threats and
intimidation to get money from noncustodial parents.
Child Support Services charged its victims excessive fees and failed
to abide by its own "rules," refusing to allow parents to cancel
contracts, the Postal Service says.
The Post Office seeks a restraining order and injunction authorizing
it to seize mail sent to any of the defendants' addresses.
The Post Office says Child Support Services of Atlanta does business
under "various names which include Child Support as a part of the name,"
in Georgia, Nevada, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware and
California."
Child Support Services used a variety of methods for the scam,
including Internet and directory assistance listings that appear to link
it to legitimate government child support collection agencies, the Post
Office says.
Most of its offices are in capital cities, reinforcing the appearance
of affiliation with state entities.
The company is accused of identifying potential victims through
public records, then subjecting them to barrages of telemarketing and
mail solicitations. Many victims were not under court order to pay child
support, but Child Support Services used threats of arrest, license
suspensions and wage garnishments to get their money, the Post Office
says.
In some instances, Child Support Services "committed explicit fraud
by forging correspondence to state child support collection entities to
indicate the correspondence was sent by a person being served by the
state entity and to direct the state entity to close its file to allow
CSS to then serve the custodial parent whose signature it forged,"
according to the complaint.
Victims were told to send their payments to local offices of Child
Support Services by mail; these payments were funneled to the company's
Georgia office, the complaint states.
|
|
|
Action Alert |
Action
Alert: Does Esquire Magazine Believe Fathers Don't Care for Their
Children?
Apparently the men's magazine Esquire believes
that fathers don't care for their children, or are not involved in
their care. In Esquire's new
piece The
Real Worst-Case Scenario for Swine Flu 2.0, Esquire contributing
editor Thomas P.M. Barnett repeatedly refers specifically and only to "moms"
when discussing the flu's possible harm to children. Barnett writes:
Could a new wave of the H1N1 virus become as radioactive for Obama as
Katrina was for Bush?...An in-depth assessment of the risks to moms and
politicians across the country...
[T]he next wave of the H1N1 virus ("swine flu,") is going to be a big
deal...most young people recover within a few days without requiring
medical treatment beyond what a caring mom would instinctively
muster...Just how difficult could things get for moms and Obama alike?
Apparently only moms care about their kids--there's no reference at all to
"dads" or "fathers", and only one reference to "parents."
Please write Esquire Magazine
at esquireeditor@hearstcorp.com and
call them at 212-649-4020 and ask them to change "moms" to "moms and dads"
or "parents" in the web version of the piece.
We live in a culture which degrades and disregards fathers, and an
important part of making political change is changing the culture. I'd be
surprised to see such a thoughtless dismissal of fathers even in an article in
the mainstream media--it's even more surprising in a men's magazine.
Thanks to Fathers & Families supporter Brian Sawyer for the information.
|
|
|
Please Take a Moment to Fill Out This Form |
Fathers & Families has a massive E-Newsletter list numbering over 50,000 members and supporters. However, we could do more with more information about our supporters. We ask that each person reading this email take a brief moment to fill out this form. It will help our movement organize better and grow stronger.
Please click here to fill out the form.
Glenn Sacks, MA Executive Director, Fathers & Families
Ned Holstein, M.D., M.S. Founder, Chairman of the Board, Fathers & Families
|
|
|
| Join Fathers & Families |

Fathers and Families is a family court reform organization with a comprehensive strategy, an impressive history of fundraising success, and the largest reach of any advocacy group of its kind:
|
|
|